Search Results for "Public Record"

16754 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16754 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Customs Sepoy for Disproportionate Assets and Wife for Abetment. Assets worth ₹1.15 crore found disproportionate to known income; wife convicted for aiding acquisition under Section 109 IPC read with Prevention of Corruption Act.

The case involves two appeals by Suresh Vinayak Morajkar (a Sepoy in the Customs & Central Excise Department) and his wife Sushma Suresh Morajkar agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Assault with Stone Causing Death of Mother-in-Law. The court found the evidence of eye-witnesses and medical evidence sufficient to prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Indrajeet Godbole, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-III, South Goa, Margao in Sessions Case No.28/2006 for the offence of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Circumstantial Chain. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Vinod Shashikant Ingle and Pooja Vinod Ingle, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Akola, for the murder of Arun Ingle under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder, Robbery, and Criminal Conspiracy in Brutal Killing of Woman. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 302, 394, 365, 201 read with 120-B IPC.

The case pertains to the brutal murder of a woman in Goa in October 2009. The prosecution alleged that the appellants, along with a co-accused and a j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Partially Allows Contractor's Appeal in Contract Dispute Over Interest and Escalation Claims. Court holds that interest under Section 34 CPC is discretionary and that escalation claims not pleaded cannot be awarded.

The dispute arose out of a contract for improvement of riding quality of NH-4A in Goa awarded by the State of Goa to P.B. Ibrahim, a Class I PWD Contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Reduces Interest Rate from 12% to 9% in Contractor's Recovery Suit Against State. The court held that interest under Section 34 CPC must be reasonable and not excessive, reducing the rate to 9% per annum.

The dispute arose out of a contract awarded by the State of Goa to P.B. Ibrahim, a Class I PWD Contractor, for improvement of riding quality of NH-4A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Scientific Officer for Unauthorised Absence and Misconduct — Petitioner Failed to Justify Absence Despite Repeated Opportunities. The court held that the termination was proportionate and that the principles of natural justice were complied with.

The petitioner, Mr. Sahivanagouda H. Patil, was a Scientific Officer at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) who had developed high-yielding groundnut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Cancelling Scheduled Caste Certificate Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Committee Failed to Provide Documents and Opportunity to Cross-Examine Complainant, Rendering Proceedings Void Under Maharashtra Act No. XXIII of 2001.

The petitioner, Bhanudas Hona Gajbhiv, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Scheduled Cast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom in Panchkula Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Circumstantial evidence including call detail records and IMEI numbers sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 364A, 392, 120B IPC.

The appellants were convicted by the trial court for kidnapping a boy, Sachin Garg, for ransom, robbery, and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Pena...