Search Results for "Export company"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Export company"

957 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 957 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 for Scheme Area.

11 Jul 2014

The judgment is from the High Court of Karnataka, presided over by Justice Anand Byrareddy, dated 11th July 2014. It pertains to a batch of writ petit...

High Court

KAHC010000842011_1

11 Jul 2014

The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Appeal Against Denial of Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Passing Off Dispute, Holding No Prima Facie Case or Balance of Convenience. Phonetic Similarity of 'CHYMTRAL FORTE' to 'CHYMORAL FORTE' Insufficient for Interim Relief Where Drugs are Schedule H Prescription Medicines and Public Interest Favors Affordable Pricing.

17 Nov 2017

The dispute arose from Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited's claim that Wockhardt Limited and East African (India) Remedies Pvt. Ltd. were passing off the...

High Court

Court Directs Cash Refund: Writ Petitions Grant Relief on CENVAT Credit. Judgement rules in favor of petitioners, mandates cash refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 for excess duty payments.

10 Jun 2024

Writ Petition Outcome captures the essence of the court's decision to grant relief based on the interpretation of Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

14 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Liability on Liaison Office Activities in India Under Income Tax Act, 1961 and DTAA. Income from printing and dispatching cheques in India through liaison offices constitutes business connection and permanent establishment, making profits attributable to such activities taxable in India.

24 Apr 2020

The respondent, U.A.E. Exchange Centre, a company incorporated in the United Arab Emirates, provided remittance services for transferring amounts from...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Transitional Input Tax Credit Under GST — Time Limit for Filing TRAN-1 Form Held Directory, Not Mandatory. The court directed the GST authorities to accept the TRAN-1 Form filed beyond the prescribed time limit, holding that the time limit was directory and the petitioner had sufficient cause for delay.

20 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Nelco Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, supplies and undertakes various network-related services. It file...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Single Judge's Order in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute — Parties Did Not Exclude Part-I of Arbitration Act by Choosing Foreign Law and Seat Abroad. The Court held that under the Bhatia International regime, Part-I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies to international commercial arbitrations held outside India unless expressly or impliedly excluded, and mere choice of foreign law and seat does not constitute implied exclusion.

6 Aug 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a Learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 15 November 2011, which held that the Court had no jurisdict...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows ESIC Appeal in Contribution Recovery Case — Limitation Period Under Section 77(1-A) of ESI Act Applies Only to Proceedings Before ESI Court, Not to Recovery Proceedings. The five-year limitation under proviso to Section 77(1-A)(b) does not bar the Corporation's claim for contribution for the period 1977-1996 when made before the ESI Court.

15 Jul 2015

The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) filed an appeal under Section 82 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, challenging the judgme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award for Breach of Cotton Supply Contract. Court Holds That District Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Interfering with Arbitrator's Findings on Factual Issues.

20 Apr 2016

The appellant, M/s. Gill & Company Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgment...

69 70 71 72 73

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)