Search Results for "Central Government consent"

3542 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3542 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Challenging High Court's Validation of Kamal Vihar Township Development Scheme. Core Legal Question is Whether Scheme Violates Constitution (73rd and 74th Amendments) and Statutory Provisions of M.P. (C.G.) Nagar Thatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973.

The Supreme Court heard a bunch of civil appeals arising from the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, which had upheld t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Waqf Tribunal's Interim Order in Property Dispute. The Revision Application Raised Jurisdictional Question Regarding the Competence of a Single-Member Tribunal After the 2013 Amendment to the Waqf Act, Without a Transitory Provision.

The case arose from a civil revision under Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act, 1995, filed by the original defendants (Magnum Developers and others) challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Allotment of Gairan Land for PMAY Housing Due to Violation of Section 22A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Collector's Order Set Aside for Failure to Establish Non-Availability of Alternative Land Before Diverting Common Pasture Land.

The petitioners, Santosh Madhukar Bhondve and others, filed a writ petition challenging the allotment of 1H 46R of land in Gut No.96, situated at Mauj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of PIL and Writ Petition Challenging FSI Increase in Mumbai Suburbs under MRTP Act. Petitioners Contended Notifications Violated Article 14 and 21 and Amounted to Major Modification Not Permissible under Section 37 of MRTP Act.

This incomplete judgment text of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, concerns two petitions: Public Interest...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Adjudicates Public Interest Petition Against Ministerial Orders on Land Reservation for Pune Telephones and Cooperative Housing Societies. The Court Considers Legality of Compromise Order and Subsequent Land Acquisition Proceedings in Light of Development Plan and ULC Act Provisions.

The petitioners, residents of Pune, filed a public interest petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 6.2.1991 (a com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Tamil Nadu's Suit Against Karnataka Over Pennaiyar River Water Dispute, Upholds 1892 Agreement as Binding and Directs Parties to Tribunal Under Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956

The State of Tamil Nadu filed a suit under Article 131 of the Constitution of India against Karnataka and the Union of India, challenging Karnataka's ...