High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions by Bar/Restaurant Licensees Against Non-Renewal of CL-9 Excise Licenses. Petitions Challenge Communications Issued by Excise Authorities and Seek Directions to Renew Licenses.
22 Aug 2017...
Search Results for "layout development"
1135 result(s) found
Found 1135 result(s)
High Court
- 45
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance of Granted Land Subject to Non-Alienation Condition. Court Examines Whether Agreement to Sell Executed During Non-Alienation Period is Void Under Karnataka SC/ST Act, 1978.
22 Jan 2026The civil revision petition arose from an order of the trial court rejecting the petitioners' application to reject the plaint in a suit for specific ...
- 17
High Court
Court Upholds PMC's Demolition Notices for Illegal Green Belt Constructions in Pune. Petitioners' Plea for Regularization Rejected; Costs Imposed for Violations of Environmental Regulations
26 Jun 2024The petitioners challenge the demolition notices issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) for illegal structures built in the green belt zone on...
- 334
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Land Owner's Appeal in Consumer Case, Holding No Joint Liability for Developer's Default. Collaboration Agreement and Tripartite Agreement Did Not Impose Obligation on Land Owner to Flat Buyers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
7 Dec 2021The appeals arose from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) allowing a complaint by flat buyers against a ...
- 357
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging KSAT Order in Service Matter — Petitioner's Application Under Section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Restored. Court Holds That Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Application for Default Without Considering Merits and That Petitioner Was Denied Opportunity of Hearing.
6 Aug 2025The petitioner, Sri T.S. Shivaramu, an Assistant Director of Treasury in the Office of the Commissioner of Treasuries, Bengaluru, filed a writ petitio...
- 168
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of Land to Third Party in IT Park — No Legitimate Expectation or Right to Specific Performance of MOU for Land Allotment. The court held that the MOU was not a concluded contract and the petitioners' remedy lay in civil court, not writ jurisdiction.
11 Feb 2010The petitioners, Patni Computers Systems Ltd and its director Sitaram R. Tiwari, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Maharashtra Ind...
- 126
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for Power Project Under MID Act and Rehabilitation Act — Acquisition Held Valid for Public Purpose of Augmenting Power Supply. The court upheld the notifications under Sections 32 and 33 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 and Sections 11, 13, 14 of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986 for acquisition of agricultural land for a 1600 MW coastal power plant.
4 Apr 2012The petitioners, residents of Taluka Alibag, District Raigad, challenged the acquisition of their agricultural lands for a 1600 MW Coastal Power Plant...
- 149
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Cooperative Housing Society's Petition for Mandamus to Demolish Staircase for Fire Access. Court holds that the Society failed to establish any legal right or breach of statutory duty by MMRDA or other authorities regarding open space requirements under Development Control Regulations.
19 Jun 2019The Petitioner, Bhavya Height Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ o...
- 227
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Appointment of Court Receiver and Directions for Possession in Redevelopment Dispute — Non-Consenting Members Directed to Vacate to Facilitate Redevelopment. Court held that overwhelming majority of society members having consented, non-consenting members cannot obstruct redevelopment and must hand over possession through Court Receiver.
3 Oct 2013The appeals arose from a judgment of the Learned Single Judge dated 16 September 2013 in a motion taken out by the first respondent (developer) in a s...
- 204
