Search Results for "family offences"

4419 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4419 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Discriminatory Furlough Condition in Maharashtra Prisons Rules as Unconstitutional. Residence-based classification for furlough eligibility violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault on a Deaf, Dumb, and Bedridden Minor Child under POCSO Act and IPC. Mother's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offence of Rape and House Trespass.

The case involves the conviction of Mukesh son of Tulshiram Madavi for offences under Section 454 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 6 read wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Accused in Murder Case, Restoring Acquittal Due to Unjustified Interference by High Court. High Court's Reversal of Acquittal Under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC Set Aside as Trial Court's View Was Plausible and Not Perse Under Principles of Section 378 Cr.P.C.

The dispute arose from a criminal appeal before the Supreme Court of India, where the appellant, an accused in a murder case, challenged the High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Including Last Seen Together, Motive, and Pointing Out of Crime Scene Held Sufficient to Prove Conspiracy Under Section 120-B IPC.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Sharda Jain (A-1), Raj Kumar (A-2), and Rajender (A-5) challenging their conviction under Sections 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Declares Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 Ultra Vires for Lack of Legislative Competence. State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appellate Jurisdiction on Supreme Court; Provision Invalid.

The case arose from an appeal filed under Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, against an eviction order passed by the Rent Contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act as Ultra Vires — State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appeal to Supreme Court. The provision bypassing High Court jurisdiction is invalid for lack of legislative competence under the Constitution.

The Supreme Court considered the validity of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which provided for a direct appeal to the Supre...