Search Results for "compensation"

11621 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11621 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Land Acquisition Appeal, Grants Uniform Compensation Rate of Rs.1,60,000 per Hectare for Bembla Project Land. The court applied the precedent from First Appeal No. 863/2010 to award compensation at the same rate with statutory benefits under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Keshaorao Narayanrao Kawalkar, filed a first appeal under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, seeking enhanced compensation for his land ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Forest Department, Upholds Compensation to Family of Murdered Forest Guard. Death of Forest Guard on patrol duty by unidentified assailants held to arise out of and in course of employment under Section 3 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The case involves a First Appeal filed by the Conservator of Forests, Nagpur, challenging the judgment and award dated 24.5.2001 passed by the Commiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of ST Bus Driver Proved. Deceased Motorcyclist's Contributory Negligence Not Established; Compensation of Rs. 2,50,000 Upheld Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) against the judgment and award dated 17/8/2004 passed by the Motor Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim - Deceased Pan Shop Owner's Income Assessed at Rs.6,000 per Month with Multiplier of 18. Negligence of Driver Established; No Contributory Negligence; Compensation Enhanced to Rs.5,00,000.

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 2.1.2006 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Wardha in M.A.C.P. No.49 of 2003. The claiman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Clause 17(iii) Bars Compensation for Delay. Contractor's Claims for Under-Utilisation of Labour, Overhead Charges, and Loss of Profits Rejected Due to Express Contractual Prohibition.

The case involves an appeal by M/s. Bombay Railways Engineering Co. against the General Manager, Central Railway, arising from a challenge to an arbit...