Search Results for "award quashing"

1068 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1068 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act and Rule 8(4) of MCR Rules, 2016. Petition Seeks Execution of Mining Lease Deed and Challenges Orders of Union and State Governments.

The petitioner, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (originally ABG Cement Ltd., later Vadraj Cement Ltd.), filed a writ petition befor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Industrial Court's Order Quashing Punishment for Illegal Strike. Dispute Centers on Whether Industrial Court Could Interfere with Disciplinary Action and Draw Adverse Inference from Alleged Minutes of Meeting.

These are six writ petitions filed by the Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenging the common order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 11099 OF 2024

The writ petition was filed by a partnership firm, Gurudatta Infrastructures, challenging the rejection of its technical bid in a tender floated by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Reduction of Debarment Penalty in Solid Waste Tender Dispute. Court Considers Whether Appeal Against Debarment Order Was Maintainable Under Contractor Registration Rules, 1992.

The dispute arose from a tender floated by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) on 08.05.2018 for transportation of municipal solid wast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses IPS Officer's Challenge to Rejection of Voluntary Retirement. Central Government's Decision to Reject Voluntary Retirement Upheld as Disciplinary Proceedings Were Contemplated and Petitioner Was Not Clear from Vigilance Angle.

The petitioner, a 1997 batch IPS officer of Maharashtra Cadre, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 7th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...