Search Results for "assessee company"

1421 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1421 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Limitation Bar Upheld. Show Cause Notice Issued After Six Years Held Time-Barred as Assessee Did Not Suppress Facts.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the order of the Customs, Excise a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Admission of Winding Up Petition in Shareholder Deadlock Case. The core issue concerns whether a petitioner who is not the registered shareholder can maintain a winding up petition after the registered shareholder merged into it.

The dispute concerned the winding up of Capital Controls India Private Limited, a joint venture between Chloro Controls (India) Private Limited and Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Tribunal's Deletion of Rental Income Addition Upheld. Rental income from property held as stock-in-trade is assessable under 'Income from House Property' and not 'Business Income' as per Section 22 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The present appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 27.02.2015 passed by the Income T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without Fresh Material Held Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. Rabo India Finance Limited, challenged the reopening of its income tax assessment for Assessment Year 2006-07 under Section 148 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...