High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Tribunal's Deletion of Rental Income Addition Upheld. Rental income from property held as stock-in-trade is assessable under 'Income from House Property' and not 'Business Income' as per Section 22 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 27.02.2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), 'A' Bench, Bangalore, in ITA No.1440/Bang/2013 for the Assessment Year 2008-2009. The Tribunal had dismissed the Revenue's appeal and deleted the addition made by the assessing officer in respect of rental income from Koramangala Property No.408. The Revenue contended that the assessing officer had estimated the rental income at a higher rate and the Tribunal erred in deleting the addition. The court considered the re-framed question of law whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition without appreciating the fact that the assessing officer had estimated the rental income at a higher rate. The court held that the rental income from property held as stock-in-trade is assessable under 'Income from House Property' under Section 22 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and not under 'Business Income'. The court found no substantial question of law arising from the Tribunal's order and dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal's decision.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Rental Income - Assessment - Section 22, Income Tax Act, 1961 - The issue was whether rental income from a property held as stock-in-trade should be assessed under 'Income from House Property' or 'Business Income'. The court held that rental income from property held as stock-in-trade is assessable under 'Income from House Property' under Section 22 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and not under 'Business Income'. The Tribunal's deletion of the addition was upheld. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made by the assessing authority in respect of rental income of Koramangala Property No.408 without appreciating the fact that the assessing officer had estimated the rental income at a higher rate.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. No substantial question of law arises. Tribunal's order upheld.

Law Points

  • Rental income from property held as stock-in-trade is assessable under 'Income from House Property' under Section 22 of the Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • not under 'Business Income'.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (02) 24

ITA No.305 of 2015

2016-02-23

Justice Jayant Patel, Justice S Sujatha

Sri E.I.Sanmathi (for appellants), Sri S Parthasarathi (for respondent)

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Bangalore and The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle -11 (5), Bangalore

Sri. Rajeev Chandrashekar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of ITAT

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought to set aside the ITAT order dated 27.02.2015 and restore the addition made by assessing officer

Filing Reason

Revenue aggrieved by deletion of addition of rental income by Tribunal

Previous Decisions

Assessing officer made addition of rental income; CIT(A) and ITAT deleted the addition

Issues

Whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made by the assessing authority in respect of rental income of Koramangala Property No.408 without appreciating the fact that the assessing officer had estimated the rental income at a higher rate.

Submissions/Arguments

Revenue argued that the assessing officer had estimated the rental income at a higher rate and the Tribunal erred in deleting the addition.

Ratio Decidendi

Rental income from property held as stock-in-trade is assessable under 'Income from House Property' under Section 22 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and not under 'Business Income'.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Counsel for the appellants-Revenue has submitted the memo for re-framing of questions of law, to which we have permitted. We may record that the re-framed questions formulated by the appellants-Revenue are as under: ...

Procedural History

Assessing officer made addition of rental income; CIT(A) deleted addition; Revenue appealed to ITAT which dismissed appeal; Revenue filed appeal under Section 260-A before High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 260-A, Section 22
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Tribunal's Deletion of Rental Income Addition Upheld. Rental income from property held as stock-in-trade is assessable under 'Income from House Property' and not 'Business Inco...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Workers' Union Against Mill Closure — No Interim Relief Granted as Closure Was Legal and Workers' Rights to Be Determined Under Section 25-O of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court held that the appellants ...