Search Results for "advisory jurisdiction"

764 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 764 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind to Bail Grant. Failure to Consider Petitioner's Release on Bail in Sessions Case No.79/2022 Rendered Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Vijay Baburao Avhad, challenged the detention order dated 19.05.2022 passed by the District Magistrate, Ahmednagar under Section 3(2) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contract Workmen's Wage Parity Claim Against Principal Employer. Existence of Agreement with Representative Union Precludes Non-Members from Claiming Higher Wages Under Contract Labour Act.

The petition was filed by Mumbai Electric Employees Union, a non-representative union of contract workmen, challenging the order of the Additional Lab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Commission Payment Disallowance Upheld. The court held that the Tribunal's finding that commission agents had not rendered services was based on valid material and sustainable under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, The Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd., is a listed company engaged in manufacturing and sale of RCC pipes, steel pipes, etc. For the assessment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age and Consensual Relationship. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and evidence showed consent.

The appellant, Omkar Dattatraya Dangat, was convicted by the Special Court under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Court holds that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenue's bail status and the availability of alternative remedies under ordinary law, rendering the detention order invalid.

The petitioner, Ram Raju @ Jatalya Umap, challenged a preventive detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Section 3(2) of the...