High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Decides Multiple Letters Patent Appeals. The Decision Involves First Appeals and Related Disputes.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Section 34(1)"
1027 result(s) found
Found 1027 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Discharge of Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
18 Jan 2022The petitioners, eight individuals, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with 401 Cr.P.C. challenging the order dated 03.10.2018 ...
- 192
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Mob Assault Case Due to Parity with Co-Accused and Long Incarceration. The court applied Section 439 CrPC to release the petitioner on bail despite serious allegations under IPC.
11 Aug 2020The petitioner, Mohammed Safwan @ Datta Safwan, was arraigned as Accused No.40 in the FIR, Accused No.42 in the charge sheet, and Accused No.25 in C.C...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
21 Aug 2020The appellant, Bhatu S/o Himmat Akhade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for the murder of his wife Sangita and for attempting t...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Guarantee Enforcement Case. Personal Guarantors Held Liable Despite Principal Borrower's Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Under Section 14 of IBC.
17 Feb 2015The petitioners, Jamboo Kumar Jain and Praful Kumar Jain, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging...
- 90
High Court
High Court Grants Bail to Accused No.21 in KCOCA Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy and Long Incarceration. The court held that mere association with co-accused without specific overt acts does not constitute conspiracy under Section 120B IPC, and prolonged detention without trial violates Article 21.
30 Jun 2022The petitioner, Mahantesh, was accused No.21 in Crime No.72/2020 of Gokak Town Police Station, registered for offences under Sections 109, 115, 166, 2...
- 171
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Compensation Claim for Deceased Passenger in Railways Act Case — Bona Fide Passenger Status Established Despite Missing Ticket. The Court held that circumstantial evidence, including police inquest report and witness testimony, can prove passenger status under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.
1 Jan 2026The appellant, Lata, wife of the deceased Chandrakant Thakkar, filed a claim for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989 after her husband fell from...
- 111
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeals Filed by 23 Accused Convicted for Murder, Rioting, and Damaging Property Under IPC and Bombay Police Act. Trial Court Convicted Accused for Offences Including Section 302 r/w 149 IPC, Stemming from Inter-Community Political Violence in Village Talaghar.
30 Nov 2015These four criminal appeals, heard together by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, arise from Sessions Case No.79 of 2004 decided by the Additiona...
- 46
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Against Money Lender Under Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007, Holding That Alleged Acts Constituted Law and Order Issue, Not Public Order. Detention Order Lacked Reasons and No Attempt to Cancel Bail, Hence Violative of Article 21.
26 Jul 2026The matter arose from a preventive detention order passed against Rajesh, a money lender running ‘Rithika Finance’, by the District Magistrate, Pa...
- 45
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds Contemnors Guilty for Breach of Undertakings in Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award. Repeated assurances to court regarding protection of assets were violated by transferring shares, constituting civil contempt under Article 129 of the Constitution.
15 Nov 2019The case arises from a dispute between Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited (the petitioner) and the respondents in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.20417 ...
- 190
