High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Mob Assault Case Due to Parity with Co-Accused and Long Incarceration. The court applied Section 439 CrPC to release the petitioner on bail despite serious allegations under IPC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 123
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mohammed Safwan @ Datta Safwan, was arraigned as Accused No.40 in the FIR, Accused No.42 in the charge sheet, and Accused No.25 in C.C.No.971/2018 arising out of Crime No.422/2014 of Mangalore Rural Police Station. The offences alleged included unlawful assembly, rioting, wrongful restraint, mischief, assault, voluntarily causing hurt, grievous hurt, attempt to murder, and robbery, all read with common intention. The incident occurred on 05.12.2014 at about 9.55 p.m. when the complainant, her mother, and her friend were traveling in an auto-rickshaw to attend a marriage function. At Ulaibettu Junction, about 200 Muslim youth armed with deadly weapons allegedly stopped the auto-rickshaw, forcibly dragged them out, assaulted them, snatched a purse and gold chain, and damaged the auto-rickshaw. The petitioner was in judicial custody since his arrest. The counsel for the petitioner argued for bail on grounds of parity, as co-accused had been granted bail, and the petitioner had been in custody for a long period. The High Court of Karnataka, presided by Justice K. Somashekar, heard the petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The court noted that the petitioner was in judicial custody for a considerable time and that the trial was not likely to conclude soon. Considering the principle of parity and the long incarceration, the court allowed the petition and granted bail to the petitioner subject to conditions. The court directed the petitioner to execute a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties, to appear before the court regularly, not to tamper with evidence, and not to leave the jurisdiction without permission.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Section 439 CrPC - Parity - The petitioner, accused of offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 427, 354, 324, 326, 307, 397 r/w 149 IPC, sought bail on grounds of parity with co-accused who had been granted bail and long incarceration. The court considered the nature of allegations, the petitioner's role, and the fact that trial was not likely to conclude soon. Held that the petitioner is entitled to bail on conditions (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, accused of serious offences including attempt to murder, is entitled to regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The petitioner shall be enlarged on bail in Crime No.422/2014 of Mangalore Rural Police Station, subject to executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties, and on conditions including appearing before the court regularly, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the jurisdiction without permission.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Section 439 CrPC
  • Parity
  • Long Incarceration
  • Serious Offences
  • Judicial Custody
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (08) 66

Criminal Petition No. 3420 of 2020

2020-08-11

K. Somashekar

Kethan Kumar (for petitioner), Divakar M. Maddur (HCGP for respondent)

Mohammed Safwan @ Datta Safwan

State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Enlargement on regular bail by the petitioner/accused

Filing Reason

Petitioner was in judicial custody since arrest and sought bail on grounds of parity and long incarceration

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel for petitioner argued for bail on grounds of parity with co-accused who were granted bail and long incarceration. HCGP opposed the bail application.

Ratio Decidendi

Bail can be granted under Section 439 CrPC on grounds of parity with co-accused who have been granted bail and considering long incarceration, even in serious offences, when trial is not likely to conclude soon.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a petition filed by Mohammed Safwan @ Datta Safwan who is arraigned as Accused No.40 in the FIR, Accused No.42 in the charge sheet and Accused No.25 in C.C.No.971/2018 arose out of Crime No.422/2014 of Mangalore rural police station, for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 427, 354, 324, 326, 307, 397 r/w 149 of IPC. The accused is in judicial custody since from the date of his arrest. Therefore, the counsel for the accused prays to enlarge him on regular bail amongst the grounds urged therein.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Petition No. 3420 of 2020 under Section 439 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru seeking regular bail in Crime No.422/2014 of Mangalore Rural Police Station. The petition was heard on 11.08.2020 and allowed.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 143, 147, 148, 341, 427, 354, 324, 326, 307, 397, 149
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 439
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Impleadment in Testamentary Suit — Appellants Fail to Establish Caveatable Interest. The Court held that mere purchasers of property from a legatee under a Will, prior to grant of probate, can...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Complaint Against Sleeping Partner in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — No Prima Facie Case as Partner Did Not Sign Cheque or Participate in Business. The court held that a sleeping partner who did not sign the cheque and ...