Search Results for "Rule 137"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Rule 137"

1185 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1185 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction Under Arms Act and IPC in 1993 Bombay Serial Blasts Case. Appellants Challenged Conviction for Possession of Prohibited Arms Without License and Destruction of Evidence.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard appeals against the conviction and sentence of Sanjay Dutt (A-117), Yusuf Mohsin Nulwalla (A-118), and Kersi Bapuji Adajania (...

High Court

KAHC010008432018_1

28 Feb 2018

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Removal of Municipal Councillors and Appointment of Administrator. Petitioners Allege Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 41 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 in Removal Orders.

10 Feb 2026

The matter comprised two writ petitions. W.P. No. 101601/2025 was filed by elected councillors of Gadag-Betageri City Municipal Council challenging th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Permits Medical Termination Beyond 20 Weeks Under MTP Act's Section 5. Court Holds That Section 5 Not Restricted to Life-Threatening Cases, Encompasses Grave Injury to Health, and Lays Down Guidelines for Future Cases.

3 Apr 2019

The Bombay High Court heard three writ petitions filed by pregnant women whose pregnancies had exceeded 20 weeks, seeking permission to undergo medica...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Suit Under Article 131 for Lack of Cause of Action and Suppression of Material Facts. The suit challenging the validity of notifications under the DSPE Act was held not maintainable as the dispute was not between the State and the Union but between the State and its own officers.

10 Jul 2024

The State of West Bengal filed a suit under Article 131 of the Constitution of India against the Union of India, challenging the validity of notificat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by School Management Challenging Tribunal Order of Reinstatement of Teacher Terminated on Grounds of Surplusage and Lack of Qualification. Court Holds That Termination Without Following Rule 26 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and Rules, 1981 Is Invalid.

28 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Shri Shivaji Education Society and the Headmaster of Shahajirao Patil Secondary School, challenged the order dated 11/12/2014 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Impleadment of Third Party in Specific Performance Suit — Consent Party Without Independent Right or Liability Not Necessary or Proper Party Under Order I Rule 10 CPC. The court held that a third party who is merely a consenting party to an agreement for sale, without any independent right or liability, is neither a necessary nor a proper party to a suit for specific performance, and the plaintiff as dominus litis cannot be compelled to litigate against such a party.

14 Jul 2022

The petitioners, as plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No. 16 of 2018, sought specific performance of an agreement dated 16.02.2015 for the sale of land...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Specific Performance Suit — Third Party Impleadment Quashed. Consent to Agreement Does Not Confer Right or Interest Under Order I Rule 10 CPC.

14 Jul 2022

The petitioners, plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No. 17 of 2018, sought specific performance of an agreement dated 16.02.2015 for sale of land Gat 49...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance — Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 52 Does Not Bar Transfer Pendente Lite, But Purchaser Must Be Heard Before Final Decree. The court held that a subsequent purchaser of suit property is a necessary and proper party under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, and amendment of plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to incorporate subsequent events should be allowed.

9 Oct 2014

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a property. The original plaintiffs (appellants) filed Suit No.1241 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Possession — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata

17 Mar 2017

The applicants (defendants in the suit) filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC challenging the trial court's order dated 30.09.2013 ...

68 69 70 71 72

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)