WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 943 OF 2021
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court of India, in a combined proceeding, dealt with a batch of writ petitions, special leave petitions, and contempt petitions invoking A...
Search Results for "Potential Value"
1050 result(s) found
Found 1050 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.
16 Aug 2018The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.
20 Jul 2016The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...
- 26
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal Against Rejection of Bail in POTA Serial Bomb Blasts Case. The Court Examines the Interpretation of Section 49(6) and (7) POTA and Applicability of Bail Restrictions After One Year of Detention.
24 Feb 2006The appeal arose from the rejection of bail by the Special Judge under the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (POTA) in connection with three serial bo...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Trial Court's Order Refusing to Summon Defence Witnesses in MCOC Case. Issue Pertains to Relevance of Confessions of Other Accused Persons Recorded Under Section 18 of MCOC Act in a Separate Trial.
26 Nov 2012The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from an order passed by the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (MC...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Process in Public Procurement Case — MSE Policy Compliance Not Violated. Petitioner's failure to opt for MSE purchase preference on GeM portal disentitled it to preferential treatment, and no procedural irregularity was established in the reverse auction or bid price modifications.
25 Oct 2024The petitioner, GTI Infotel Private Limited, an MSE entity, challenged the entire tender process of respondent No.1, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation L...
- 493
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Auction Forfeiture Case — Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Upheld as Compensation for Breach of Contract. The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money deposit by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is not subject to proof of actual loss and is governed by the terms of the auction contract, not Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
10 Aug 2022The case involves two appeals by a nationalized bank (appellant) against a common judgment of the Madras High Court, which had allowed the writ petiti...
- 168
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Terminal Excise Duty Refund Dispute Under Foreign Trade Policy. Export Oriented Units Not Entitled to Refund as Procurement from Domestic Tariff Area Units Was Ab Initio Exempt from Excise Duty Under Paragraphs 6.2(b) and 6.11(c)(ii) of Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014.
4 Jan 2022The dispute involved appeals by Export Oriented Units (EOUs) challenging the refusal of refund claims for Terminal Excise Duty (TED) paid on excisable...
- 217
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Holds that Taking Insurance Policy for Commercial Premises is for Commercial Purpose, Excluding Complainant from Definition of 'Consumer' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court ruled that a commercial entity taking fire insurance policy for its business premises is not a 'consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Act, as the policy is taken for commercial purpose.
13 Apr 2023The present appeals by special leave assail the judgment and order dated 3rd December, 2004 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Na...
- 169
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Winding Up of Mutual Fund Schemes and Interprets SEBI Regulations. The Court examined the interrelation and constitutional validity of Regulations 39 to 42 with Regulation 18(15)(c) of the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, while deferring final adjudication pending statutory proceedings under the SEBI Act, 1992.
14 Jul 2021The Supreme Court of India addressed civil appeals concerning the interpretation and application of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual...
- 351
