Search Results for "Kerala Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Kerala Act"

4006 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4006 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Development Control Regulation 33(7) Allowing Enhanced FSI for Reconstruction. Petition Filed by Public-Spirited Citizens Claims Regulation Exacerbates Population Congestion in Island City.

11 Dec 2006

This public interest litigation, filed by three public-spirited citizens of Mumbai, challenged the legality of Regulation 33(7) of the Development Con...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Landowners' Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disputes - Restores Reference Court's Market Value for Dry Lands Due to Lack of Reasons in High Court Judgment. Compensation for Wetlands Upheld at High Court's Rate as No Evidentiary Basis Existed for Enhancement Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

10 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard consolidated civil appeals concerning compensation disputes under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appeals were fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows ESIC Appeal in Contribution Recovery Case — Limitation Period Under Section 77(1-A) of ESI Act Applies Only to Proceedings Before ESI Court, Not to Recovery Proceedings. The five-year limitation under proviso to Section 77(1-A)(b) does not bar the Corporation's claim for contribution for the period 1977-1996 when made before the ESI Court.

15 Jul 2015

The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) filed an appeal under Section 82 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, challenging the judgme...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Delhi Land Reforms Act Section 50(a) - Upholds Constitutional Validity and Succession Rules for Agricultural Land. The Court held that Section 50(a) of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 is protected under Article 31B of the Constitution due to its inclusion in the Ninth Schedule before 1973, and no repugnancy exists with the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as they operate in different legislative fields under State and Concurrent Lists.

20 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court of India dismissed a civil appeal challenging the constitutional validity of Section 50(a) of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon-Elgar Parishad Case Under UAP Act. Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 and Entitles Accused to Bail Despite Section 43D(5) Bar.

19 Sep 2022

The appellant, Hany Babu, a professor and academic, was arrested on 28 July 2020 in connection with FIR No. 1 of 2020 registered by the National Inves...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Appointment of Receiver in Share Pledge Dispute. Court upholds appointment of Court Receiver as receiver of pledged shares under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding that the appellant failed to make out a prima facie case for interference.

10 Aug 2019

The case involves two commercial appeals filed against an order of the learned Single Judge appointing the Court Receiver as receiver of certain pledg...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to BDA Scheme Non-Lapse and Government's Withdrawal Notification. Scheme Under BDA Act Does Not Lapse Automatically Under Section 27; Government's Power to Withdraw from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld.

3 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Sri H. Krishna Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the 'By...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Public Servant in Lokayukta Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Criminal proceedings initiated without prior sanction from competent authority are void ab initio and cannot be sustained.

7 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Mr. Thimmaiah, was arrayed as accused No.1 in Crime No.80/2015 registered by the Lokayukta Police, Bangalore Urban Division, for offen...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Act No.4 of 2015 and Claim for Additional Increment by Aided School Staff. The case examines whether aided school employees are entitled to Kannada language increment on par with government staff and if the amendment nullifying such benefit is valid.

24 Jul 2020

The writ petitions were filed by teaching and non-teaching staff of private aided educational institutions in Karnataka, challenging the constitutiona...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision Allowing Rectification of GST Returns in Error Period. The Court affirmed that circulars restricting rectification of Form GSTR-3B to net basis adjustments are inconsistent with GST laws and that rectification must be permitted in the period of error occurrence under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

28 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Delhi dated 05.05.2020 in W.P. (C) No. 6345 of 2018, which allowed a writ petition filed by Bhar...

68 69 70 71 72

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)