WRIT PETITION NO. 5204 OF 2019
20 Nov 2019The present writ petition was filed by six petitioners, including two public limited companies and four individuals, challenging an order dated 30.05....
Search Results for "Counter claim"
3519 result(s) found
Found 3519 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals by Authority for Advance Rulings Against High Court Judgment Quashing AAR's Rejection of Treaty Benefits. Questions Raised on Taxation of Capital Gains Under India-Mauritius DTAA and Scope of Section 245R(2) Proviso (iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.
1 Jan 1970The disputes arose from applications for advance ruling filed by three Mauritius-incorporated companies—Tiger Global International II Holdings, Tige...
- 164
High Court
High Court of Bombay Examines Challenge to Arbitral Award Directing Payment of Rs.9,28,188.45 with Interest. The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from a member-client dispute over stock market transactions and margin shortfalls.
14 Oct 2014The petitioner filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicature at Bom...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on rate analysis and rejection of counterclaims under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
20 Apr 2015The Union of India, through the Executive Engineer, CPWD, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging ...
- 123
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Jurisdiction Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award on Jurisdiction. The court held that the arbitral tribunal had jurisdiction to decide claims arising from invoices under the distribution agreement, as the arbitration clause covered all disputes in connection with the agreement.
4 Mar 2016The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a judgment dated 9 June 2015 passed by a learn...
- 100
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Whether Lift Installation Contracts Are 'Works Contract' or 'Sale of Goods' for Sales Tax Purposes. The Matter Was Referred to a Larger Bench to Resolve Conflict Between Prior Rulings and to Determine the Applicability of the Predominant Intention Test After Recent Judgments.
1 Aug 2026The matter stems from multiple writ petitions and civil appeals challenging the classification of contracts for manufacture, supply and installation o...
- 81
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Alleging Deceptive Similarity in Beer Trade Marks. Plaintiff Claims 'Hercules Black Label' Infringes 'Kalyani Black Label'.
1 Apr 2013The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard an appeal filed by United Breweries Ltd (plaintiff) against the judgment and decree of the XXV Addition...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Legality of Orders under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Applicability of Repeal Act, 1999. Petition Seeks Quashing of Settlement, Notification, and Possession Orders Based on Erroneous Computation of Excess Land and Abatement of Proceedings.
13 Feb 2019The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urba...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Eviction Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice Under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Notice sent by UPC without acknowledgment due was held insufficient to terminate tenancy.
3 Sep 2025The revision application was filed by the applicant (defendant No.2) against the judgment and decree dated 4th May 2022 passed by the Appellate Bench ...
- 24
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses First Defendant's Appeal in Partition Suit — Confirms Concurrent Findings on Joint Family Property and Limitation. Court holds that suit for partition is not barred by limitation as long as the plaintiff remains in joint possession and that a co-parcener can seek partition of joint family property even after a preliminary decree.
18 Mar 2015This is a first defendant's second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 09.04.2010 pas...
- 110
