WRIT PETITION NO. 2993 of 2024
25 Jun 2025The petitioner, Reshu Singh, an Assistant Professor at Mumbadevi Adarsh Sanskrit Mahavidyalay, challenged orders dated 30/10/2023 and a letter dated 2...
Search Results for "Central Government employee"
2171 result(s) found
Found 2171 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Applicability of Employees' Provident Funds Act to Pigmy Agents of Cooperative Banks. Writ Petitions Filed by Both Banks and Provident Fund Authorities Challenge Tribunal Orders on Coverage of Such Agents Under Section 18(3)(d) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
25 Apr 2019A group of writ petitions came before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, filed by multiple cooperative banks and by the Assistant Provident Fund Com...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Probationary Employee Without Opportunity of Hearing. Appointment Order Condition Regarding Satisfactory Completion of Probation Period Must Be Read as Requiring Reasonable Opportunity Before Termination.
28 Feb 2019The petitioner, Shailesh Sadanand Raut, applied for the post of Works Assistant in the Public Works Department (PWD) of the State of Goa pursuant to a...
- 127
High Court
Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Seafarer's Compensation Case, Upholds Entitlement Under Employees' Compensation Act but Denies TCC Agreement Claim. Court holds that compensation under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 is the statutory minimum and cannot be substituted by a contractual claim under a TCC agreement unless expressly provided.
19 Jan 2022The appellant, Mosa Anand Rajulu, was employed as an Ordinary Seafarer with respondent No. 1, M/s. V. Ships Monaco, on board MV DT PROVIDENCE. On 30 M...
- 57
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Explanations to Rule 38 of MCR, 2016 and Rule 45(8)(a) of MCDR, 2017 — Royalty Computation on Gross Sale Value Without Deduction of Royalty, DMF, and NMET Contributions is Valid. The Court held that royalty is a tax and not a contractual consideration, and the impugned explanations do not violate Article 14 or Article 265 of the Constitution.
15 Nov 2024The petitioners, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity...
- 473
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Maharashtra State Handlooms Corporation Against ESI Coverage for Akola Sale Depot. Sale Depot Held to Be a 'Shop' Under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, Requiring Payment of ESI Contributions.
22 Dec 2025The appellant, Maharashtra State Handlooms Corporation Limited, challenged the judgment and order dated 18.01.2010 passed by the Industrial Court, Ako...
- 129
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of CISF Constable Challenging Removal from Service for Unauthorized Absence. Disciplinary Authority's Order of Removal Upheld as Not Disproportionate to Misconduct of Absence Without Leave for Over 8 Months.
28 Jun 2022The petitioner, a constable in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), was removed from service by an order dated 7th May 2012 issued by the Com...
- 89
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition for Compassionate Appointment Due to Inordinate Delay and Laches. The court held that unexplained delay of over 12 years in seeking appointment on compassionate grounds after the employee's death disentitles the petitioner to discretionary relief under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
3 Apr 2017The petitioner, Mubeen Sharieff, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing th...
- 103
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Service Matter — Limitation Bar for Recovery of Salary Arrears. Suit for recovery of salary arrears filed after 20 years held barred by limitation under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963.
24 Feb 2022The appellant, Smt. Rabiya Abdul Hamid Bepari, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Pro...
- 106
High Court
Madras High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Quashing Recovery of Excess Pay from Government Employee; Holds Recovery After Long Delay Without Misrepresentation Impermissible Under Rafiq Masih Principles, Confirms Pay Revision and Directs Refund of Amount Recovered.
10 Jul 2026The case arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by D. Sivakumar, a government employee working as Central Naz...
- 51
