Search Results for "western coalfields"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "western coalfields"

131 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 131 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Widow and Minor Children of Deceased Awarded Enhanced Compensation for Death of Breadwinner. Negligence of Trax Driver Established; Insurance Company Liable to Pay Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

29 Jan 2021

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 18/10/2013 passed by the Claims Tribunal, Nagpur in M.A.C.P No.686/2008. The appellants, being the w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows WCL Petition in Service Dispute — Labour Court Order Under Section 33(C)(2) Quashed for Lack of Jurisdiction. Claim for Higher Grade and Arrears from 1974 to 2014 Held Not Maintainable Without Prior Adjudication and Barred by Limitation.

24 Jan 2020

The petitioners, Western Coalfields Limited (WCL), a Central Government undertaking, challenged the judgment of the Labour Court dated 5.5.2018, which...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Electricity Bills Due to Disputed Facts. Petitioners' challenge to supplementary bills for electricity consumption fails as disputed questions of fact cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

10 Jan 2020

The petitioners, M/s. J.P. Electrical Enterprises and Jai Prakash Rajbali Singh, filed three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Against Gratuity Award in Favour of Dismissed Employee for Fraudulent School Certificate. Forfeiture of Gratuity Upheld Under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Misconduct Involving Moral Turpitude.

10 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Western Coalfields Ltd., challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority (Assistant Commissioner, Labour, Chandrapur) dated 21.10.2...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Central Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is distinct from that of the manufacturer, and the benefit of the second proviso (duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The Court held that the buyer's refund claim is time-barred as it was filed beyond six months from the date of purchase, and the manufacturer's protest does not extend the limitation for the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim in Central Excise Duty Case — Limitation Period Applies Separately to Buyer. The Court held that the period of limitation of six months under Section 11B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to a buyer's refund claim even if the manufacturer paid duty under protest, as the rights of manufacturer and buyer are distinct.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the appellant/buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise dut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rectification of Defect in Tender Submission - Bank Solvency Certificate Expired by Four Days. The court held that the requirement to furnish a bank solvency certificate within three months before tender opening was an ancillary term, and the respondent's refusal to allow rectification was discriminatory.

10 Aug 2010

The petitioner, a partnership firm and long-standing contractor of Western Coalfields Limited (respondent No.1), challenged communications dated 05.05...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Bidder in Sand Ghat Auction Dispute, Quashing Demand for 75% Bid Amount After Cancellation. Auction Conditions Limit Remedy to Forfeiture of Deposit and Recovery of Difference on Reauction, Not Full Bid Amount.

16 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Western Coalfields Ltd., participated in an auction for sand ghats in Yavatmal district conducted by the State of Maharashtra. The pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Employee in Coal India Service Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as No Inquiry Held Before Dismissal Based on Self-Declaration. Rule 34(1)(ii) of Coal India Executives Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1978 Requires Inquiry Before Penalty of Removal.

5 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Shri Sheopurari Singh, was employed as Deputy General Manager (Vigilance) in M-1 Grade at the Vigilance Department of Western Coalfiel...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)