Bombay High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Widow and Minor Children of Deceased Awarded Enhanced Compensation for Death of Breadwinner. Negligence of Trax Driver Established; Insurance Company Liable to Pay Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 18/10/2013 passed by the Claims Tribunal, Nagpur in M.A.C.P No.686/2008. The appellants, being the widow and minor children of deceased Anantrao Zade, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation for his death in a motor vehicular accident on 29/06/2008. The deceased was riding a motorcycle when a trax vehicle dashed against him, causing fatal injuries. The claimants alleged rash and negligent driving by the trax driver. The Insurance Company contested on grounds of contributory negligence and breach of policy conditions due to lack of valid driving licence. The Tribunal awarded Rs.12,43,000/- with interest. The claimants appealed for enhancement. The High Court held that the finding of negligence was correct and no contributory negligence was proved. On quantum, the Court applied a multiplier of 16, added 40% towards future prospects to the deceased's salary of Rs.12,432 per month, deducted 1/3rd for personal expenses, and calculated loss of dependency at Rs.16,72,704/-. Adding Rs.70,000/- under conventional heads, the total compensation was enhanced to Rs.17,42,704/-. The Insurance Company was held liable to pay the amount with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition, with liberty to recover from the insured if breach of policy conditions is established.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Negligence - Death in vehicular accident - Claimants alleged rash and negligent driving by driver of offending trax vehicle - Tribunal held driver of trax negligent - No contributory negligence by deceased - Held that finding of negligence is based on evidence and not interfered with (Paras 2-4).

B) Motor Accident Claims - Quantum of Compensation - Computation of loss of dependency - Deceased aged 35 years, earning Rs.12,432 per month - Tribunal applied multiplier of 16 and deducted 1/3rd for personal expenses - Held that addition of 40% towards future prospects is warranted as per settled law, and multiplier of 16 is correct (Paras 5-7).

C) Motor Accident Claims - Liability of Insurance Company - Breach of policy conditions - Driver not possessing valid driving licence - Insurance Company failed to prove breach - Held that Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation and may recover from insured if breach is established (Para 8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal was just and proper, and whether the Insurance Company was liable to indemnify the insured despite alleged breach of policy conditions.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The impugned judgment and award is modified. The claimants are entitled to total compensation of Rs.17,42,704/- with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till realization. The Insurance Company is directed to deposit the enhanced amount within eight weeks. The Insurance Company is at liberty to recover the amount from the insured if breach of policy conditions is established.

Law Points

  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 166
  • Section 173
  • Compensation for death
  • Negligence
  • Contributory negligence
  • Quantum of compensation
  • Multiplier
  • Future prospects
  • Deduction for personal expenses
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (01) 95

First Appeal No. 944 of 2017

2021-01-29

Smt. Anuja Prabhudessai, J.

Shri A.J. Pophaly for Appellant, Shri D.N. Kukday for Respondent No.1

Smt. Rekha Wd/o Anantram Zade, Ku. Prajakta D/o Anantrao Zade, Master Pratik s/o Anatrao Zade

National Insurance Company Ltd., Aamir Parvez S/o Abdul Hannam Sidique, Smt. Sakubai Wd/o Pundlik Zade

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against judgment and award of Claims Tribunal in a motor accident claim petition.

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal for death of the deceased in a motor vehicular accident.

Filing Reason

Claimants were dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal and sought enhancement.

Previous Decisions

Claims Tribunal, Nagpur in M.A.C.P No.686/2008 awarded Rs.12,43,000/- with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition.

Issues

Whether the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal was just and proper? Whether the Insurance Company is liable to indemnify the insured despite alleged breach of policy conditions regarding driving licence?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the Tribunal erred in not adding future prospects and in applying a lower multiplier, and that the compensation was inadequate. Respondent No.1 Insurance Company argued that the driver did not possess a valid driving licence, thus there was breach of policy conditions, and that the compensation was excessive.

Ratio Decidendi

In motor accident claims, for computing loss of dependency, addition of 40% towards future prospects is warranted for a deceased aged 35 years with a fixed salary. The multiplier of 16 is appropriate. Deduction of 1/3rd for personal expenses is correct. The Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation even if there is breach of policy conditions, with liberty to recover from the insured.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellants, who shall hereinafter be referred to as the Claimants, had filed an application under Section 166 of the M.V. Act in view of death of Anantrao Jade in a motor vehicular accident on 29/06/2018. The Claimants being the widow and the minor children of the deceased claimed total compensation of Rs.17,50,000/- from the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 being the insurer and insured of the offending vehicle. The Respondent No.1 – Insurance Company contested the petition mainly on the ground of contributory negligence. The Tribunal awarded Rs.12,43,000/- with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition. Considering the age of the deceased, the multiplier of 16 is applicable. The claimants are entitled to addition of 40% towards future prospects. The Insurance Company is directed to deposit the enhanced amount within eight weeks.

Procedural History

The claimants filed M.A.C.P No.686/2008 before the Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, which awarded Rs.12,43,000/- on 18/10/2013. Aggrieved, the claimants filed First Appeal No. 944 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which was heard and disposed of on 29/01/2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166, Section 173
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeals in Liquidation Priority Dispute — Official Liquidator's Statutory Lien Under Section 529A of Companies Act Prevails Over State's Claim Under MPID Act. The court held that the Companies Act, 1956, being a ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Widow and Minor Children of Deceased Awarded Enhanced Compensation for Death of Breadwinner. Negligence of Trax Driver Established; Insurance Company Liable to...