Search Results for "suit tenability"

181 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 181 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Possessory Title Not Required for Restoration Under Order XXI Rules 98-100 CPC. High Court erred in ordering restoration of possession without determining whether respondent had any right to possession under Order XXI Rules 98-100 CPC.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court which had allowed the appeal of the respondent (Lt. Col. Nahar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Wakf Tribunal Order Upholding Plaintiff's Title Over Wakf Property. The court held that the Wakf Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide the suit and that the plaintiff's suit was not barred by limitation.

The case involves a dispute over Survey Gut No.66 of village Harsool, Aurangabad. The plaintiff, Pratapsingh s/o Nursing Kakarwal, filed a suit before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Considers Appeal Against Admission of Coffee Day Enterprises to CIRP Under Section 7 of Insolvency Code. Appeal Raises Questions on the Validity of Debenture Trustee's Action and Limitation Period Based on Debenture Trust Deed Provisions.

The appeal arose from an order of the NCLT Bengaluru Bench admitting Coffee Day Enterprises Limited (the corporate debtor) into Corporate Insolvency R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Trust Property Encroachment Case — Defendant Acquitted of Adverse Possession Claim. Suit for Possession by Trust Held Not Barred by Limitation as Encroachment is Continuing Wrong Under Section 23 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Namdeo Khedkar (appellant/defendant) against the judgment of the Joint District Judge, Chandrapur, which re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Recovery Officer's Confirmation of Private Sale. Court Holds That Once Sale Is Confirmed and Possession Delivered, Remedy Lies in Civil Suit for Damages, Not in Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Shaikh Gulab Shaikh Ahmed and Ambadas Maruti Kale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...