High Court of Karnataka hears Public Interest Litigation in WP No.27674/2012 concerning Karnataka Public Service Commission selections. Court's judgment text not provided; no specific legal finding available.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "section 202 inquiry"
676 result(s) found
Found 676 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Application Under Section 482 CrPC Challenging Magistrate's Refusal to Order Police Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC — Magistrate's Discretion to Treat Application as Complaint Upheld as Legal and Proper.
25 Apr 2019The applicant, Nikhil s/o Dhondiram Katke, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) challenging a...
- 50
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — Magistrate's Power to Issue Process Under Section 204 Cr.P.C. Without Examining All Witnesses Upheld When Offence is Exclusively Triable by Sessions Court. The Court held that Section 200 Cr.P.C. does not require examination of all cited witnesses before issuing process, and Section 202 Cr.P.C. is not mandatory for private complaints involving offences exclusively triable by Sessions Court.
20 Mar 2014The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused persons (petitioners) against an order passed by the learned JMFC II Court, Hubli,...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to CCI Investigation Order in Alleged Anti-Competitive Agreement Case. Court upholds CCI's prima facie finding of contravention under Section 3(3) of the Competition Act, 2002, rejecting the argument that the informant lacked standing as a competitor.
12 Sep 2025The petitioner, Asian Paints Limited, challenged an order dated 12 March 2025 passed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) under Section 26(1) ...
- 66
High Court
- 45
High Court
Karnataka High Court Quashes Wildlife Offence Proceedings Against Accused in C.C.No.2319/2023 Due to Procedural Irregularities and Violation of Investigation Protocol. Registration of Second FIR in FOC No.20/2022 After Prior FIR in FOC No.1/2022 Held Impermissible, and Magistrate's Dual Cognizance and Hybrid Investigation Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Not Sustainable.
6 Oct 2023Background: The petitions arose from criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioners for alleged offences under the Wild Life (Protection) Act,...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Denying Locus Standi to Employees in Reference Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act. Individual Workmen Have No Independent Right to Prosecute Reference but Industrial Court Must Exercise Discretion to Hear Them if Interests Affected.
6 Nov 2006The petitioners, employees of Empress Mills Retail Sales Division, challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 16th October 1995 which held that...
- 100
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Forgery Case Due to Bar on Second Complaint Without Fresh Evidence. Second Complaint on Same Allegations with Additional Details but No New Evidence Held Not Maintainable Under Section 203 CrPC.
1 Jan 2020The case involves a dispute among the heirs of G.S. Naidu, who owned a Maruti-800 vehicle and died on 12.12.2001. The complainant, the second son of G...
- 242
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.
24 Mar 2023This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...
- 364
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Magistrate's Order in Cooperative Bank Directors' Case — Abuse of Process and Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Criminal proceedings under Sections 406, 468, 477A IPC read with Section 34 IPC quashed as the Magistrate ignored the High Court's earlier order restoring the complaint for consideration under Section 202 CrPC, and the directors being public servants required sanction for prosecution.
19 Aug 2013The applicants, nine directors of a cooperative bank, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking qu...
- 173
