Search Results for "section 127 MRTP Act"

129 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against 50% TDR Curtailment for Surrendered Land Under MRTP Act. Held that Development Control Regulations cannot override statutory entitlement under Section 126 of the MRTP Act, 1966.

The petitioners, M/s. Aswani Associates and Shri Sandeep Rasiklal Shah, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 17 October 2017 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Building Permission Due to Playground Reservation Under MRTP Act. Notice Under Section 127 Held Not Premature as 10-Year Period for Acquisition Had Expired.

The petitioner, Irfan Allabaksh Shaikh, owned land bearing CTS No. 6167 in Siddheshwar Peth, Solapur, which was reserved as a playground (site No. 319...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Land Reserved for Garden Since 1976 — Award Under Section 23 of RFCTLARR Act 2013 Quashed as Acquisition Not Completed Within Statutory Period

The petitioners, owners of land in Kankavali, challenged the reservation of their land for a garden under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapsing of Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Statutory Period. Land reserved for postal staff quarters since 1979 becomes free from reservation after notice under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Balkrishna Jagannath Lad, owned land bearing survey No. 103/12/1D/1A at Pandharpur within the limits of Pandharpur Municipal Council. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reservation on Land Due to Mapping Error and Non-Acquisition. The court quashed the reservation on the petitioner's land as the reservation chart showed a different survey number and no acquisition steps were taken for decades.

The petitioner, an agriculturist aged 77, is a joint owner of agricultural land Gat No. 933 (Old Survey No. 212/1) admeasuring 15R. In 1981, responden...