Bombay High Court Allows Declaration of Lapsed Reservation Under MRTP Act for Land Reserved for Public Purpose - Failure to Acquire Within Statutory Period Results in Deemed Lapse. Petitioner's land reserved for high school and playground under final development plan; Municipal Corporation failed to acquire land despite notice under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 239
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Supreme Industries Ltd., owned land in survey nos. 245/2 and 245/3 at village Mehroon, Jalgaon. The final development plan for Jalgaon, published on 11.02.2002 and modified on 10.08.2004, reserved 74 R out of survey no. 245/2 and 92 R out of survey no. 245/3 for a high school and playground. The Jalgaon Municipal Corporation did not take any steps to acquire or develop the land. Consequently, the petitioner issued a notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act) on 09.12.2014, calling upon the Corporation to take steps for development and warning that failure would result in the reservation lapsing. The Corporation acknowledged receipt of the notice but, by communication dated 19.12.2014, asked the petitioner to submit documents such as 7/12 extracts and certified copies of sale deeds to prove ownership. The petitioner complied, but the Corporation did not initiate acquisition proceedings. The petitioner then filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the reservation had lapsed and the land was free from reservation. The court held that since the Corporation failed to take steps for acquisition within the statutory period after the notice, the reservation stood deemed to have lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act. The court declared that the land was free from reservation and directed the Corporation to issue a notification to that effect within three months.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Deemed Lapse of Reservation - Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Petitioner's land reserved for high school and playground under final development plan published on 11.02.2002 and modification plan published on 10.08.2004 - Municipal Corporation failed to acquire land within statutory period - Petitioner issued notice under Section 127 on 09.12.2014 - Corporation sought documents but did not initiate acquisition - Held that reservation deemed to have lapsed and land free from reservation (Paras 3-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reservation on the petitioner's land under the final development plan has lapsed due to the failure of the Municipal Corporation to take steps for acquisition within the statutory period after notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, declaring that the reservation on the petitioner's land to the extent of 74 R out of survey no. 245/2 and 92 R out of survey no. 245/3 is deemed to have lapsed and the land is free from reservation. The respondents were directed to issue a notification to that effect within three months.

Law Points

  • Deemed lapse of reservation under Section 127 of MRTP Act
  • 1966
  • Failure to acquire land within statutory period
  • Issuance of notice under Section 127
  • Non-compliance with notice leads to lapse
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (08) 10

WRIT PETITION NO. 7163 OF 2016

2017-08-10

R.M. BORDE, S.M. GAVHANE

Mr. S.S. Bora for petitioner, Mr. P.S. Pawar for respondents 1 and 3, Mr. P.R. Patil for respondent no. 2

Supreme Industries Ltd.

State of Maharashtra, The Planning Authority / Commissioner Jalgaon City Municipal Corporation, Development Authority

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking declaration that reservation on land has lapsed under Section 127 of MRTP Act.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that the property belonging to petitioner to the extent of 74 R out of survey no. 245/2 and 92 R out of survey no. 245/3 is free from reservation/allotment/designation.

Filing Reason

Municipal Corporation failed to take steps for acquisition of land reserved for public purpose despite notice under Section 127.

Issues

Whether the reservation on the petitioner's land under the final development plan has lapsed due to the failure of the Municipal Corporation to take steps for acquisition within the statutory period after notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Issued notice under Section 127 on 09.12.2014; Corporation failed to take steps; reservation deemed lapsed. Respondent: Corporation asked for documents by communication dated 19.12.2014; no admission of lapse.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, if land reserved for public purpose is not acquired within the statutory period after issuance of notice by the owner, the reservation is deemed to have lapsed and the land becomes free from reservation.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner is praying for issuance of declaration that the property belonging to petitioner to the extent of 74 R out of survey no. 245/2 and 92 R out of survey no. 245/3 ... earmarked for public purpose ... is free from reservation/allotment/designation. Respondent Municipal Corporation is not disputing receipt of notice issued by petitioner under section 127 of MRTP Act on 09.12.2014.

Procedural History

Petitioner issued notice under Section 127 of MRTP Act on 09.12.2014; Corporation responded on 19.12.2014 seeking documents; no acquisition steps taken; petitioner filed writ petition in 2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: 127
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Tenure Dispute, Reversing High Court on Urbanization Effect. The Court held that the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, continues to govern land rights even after a notification under Section 507(a) of the Delhi Municip...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Preemption Suit in Sale Registration Dispute. Majority Holds Sale of Immovable Property Not Complete Until Registration Under Section 61 of Registration Act, 1908, Despite Retrospective Effect Under Section 47.