Bombay High Court Allows Declaration of Lapsed Reservation Under MRTP Act for Land Reserved for Municipal Purpose - Purchase Notice Not Responded Within Statutory Period. The court held that failure to acquire land within 12 months of purchase notice under Section 49(7) of MRTP Act results in lapsing of reservation, directing State to issue declaration under Section 127(2).

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. Sanghvi Erectors Private Limited, owned land admeasuring 3032 sq.mtrs. in Pune, which was reserved for 'municipal purpose' under reservation no. MP 17 in the sanctioned Development Plan of Pune City under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act). On 11 July 2017, the petitioner issued a purchase notice under Section 49(7) of the MRTP Act to the State Government to purchase the land, also requesting a personal hearing. On 17 January 2018, the State Government confirmed the purchase, but no further steps were taken to acquire the land within the statutory period of 12 months from the date of the notice. The petitioner then filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the reservation had lapsed and a writ of mandamus directing the State Government to issue a declaration under Section 127(2) of the MRTP Act in the Government Gazette. The court considered the provisions of Section 49(7) and Section 127 of the MRTP Act. The court held that since the State Government failed to take steps to acquire the land within 12 months of the purchase notice, the reservation lapsed. The court allowed the petition, declaring that the reservation on the land had lapsed and directing the State Government to issue a declaration under Section 127(2) within 12 weeks. The court also directed that upon such declaration, the land would be available to the petitioner for development as per the permissible use in the Development Plan.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Lapsing of Reservation - Section 49(7) and Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Purchase Notice - The petitioner issued a purchase notice under Section 49(7) on 11 July 2017 for land reserved for municipal purpose. The State Government confirmed purchase on 17 January 2018 but failed to take further steps within 12 months. The court held that the reservation lapsed and directed the State Government to issue a declaration under Section 127(2) within 12 weeks. (Paras 2-8)

B) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Article 226 of Constitution of India - The court issued a writ of mandamus directing the State Government to issue a declaration in the Government Gazette that the reservation has lapsed, as the statutory period under Section 49(7) had expired without acquisition. (Paras 2-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reservation on the petitioner's land has lapsed due to the failure of the State Government to respond to the purchase notice within the statutory period under Section 49(7) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, declaring that the reservation on the petitioner's land has lapsed. The court directed the State Government to issue a declaration under Section 127(2) of the MRTP Act in the Government Gazette within 12 weeks from the date of the order. Upon such declaration, the land shall be available to the petitioner for development as per the permissible use in the Development Plan.

Law Points

  • Reservation lapses if purchase notice not responded within 12 months
  • Section 49(7) MRTP Act
  • Section 127 MRTP Act
  • Declaration of lapsing reservation
  • Writ of mandamus
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (09) 120

WRIT PETITION NO. 1681 OF 2020

2022-09-13

R. D. Dhanuka, Kamal Khata

2022:BHC-AS:21632-DB

Mr. Drupad S. Patil, Mr. A.A. Alaspurkar, Mr. Vishwanath Patil

M/s. Sanghvi Erectors Private Limited

The State of Maharashtra, The Pune Municipal Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking declaration that reservation on land has lapsed and for writ of mandamus to issue declaration under Section 127(2) of MRTP Act.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks declaration that reservation on land admeasuring 3032 sq.mtrs. has lapsed and land is available for development, and writ of mandamus directing State Government to issue declaration in Government Gazette under Section 127(2) of MRTP Act.

Filing Reason

Petitioner issued purchase notice under Section 49(7) of MRTP Act on 11 July 2017 for land reserved for municipal purpose. State Government confirmed purchase on 17 January 2018 but failed to take steps to acquire land within 12 months, leading to lapsing of reservation.

Issues

Whether the reservation on the petitioner's land has lapsed due to failure of State Government to respond to purchase notice within statutory period under Section 49(7) of MRTP Act. Whether the petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandamus directing the State Government to issue a declaration under Section 127(2) of MRTP Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that purchase notice was issued on 11 July 2017, State confirmed on 17 January 2018, but no acquisition steps taken within 12 months, hence reservation lapsed. Respondents did not contest the petition; State and Corporation waived service and rule was made returnable forthwith.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 49(7) of the MRTP Act, if a purchase notice is issued and the authority fails to take steps to acquire the land within 12 months, the reservation lapses. The court has the power to issue a writ of mandamus directing the State to issue a declaration under Section 127(2) to that effect.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a declaration that the reservation, designation, allotment, indication or restriction on the development of the land admeasuring 3032 sq.mtrs. has lapsed and the said land is available to the petitioner for the purpose of development... On 11th July, 2017, the petitioner issued notice under section 49(7) of the MRTP Act to the State Government to purchase the said land. On 17th January, 2018, the State Government confirmed the purchase... Rule is made returnable forthwith.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 1681 of 2020 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The court issued rule and made it returnable forthwith. The respondents waived service. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 13 September 2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: 49(7), 127, 127(2)
  • Constitution of India: 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Nursing College Seeking Recognition for B.Sc and M.Sc Nursing Courses. Appellant failed to submit complete application and lacked own Parent Hospital as required by Indian Nursing Council guidelines.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Impleadment of Legal Heirs in Partition Suit — Emphasizes Mandatory Inquiry Under Order XXII Rule 5 CPC. Trial Court directed to decide application for bringing legal representatives on record after hearing all...