Search Results for "revisional jurisdiction"

2437 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2437 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Criminal Revision Petitions in Cheating Case — Conviction Under Section 420 IPC Upheld. Court finds concurrent findings of fact based on credible evidence and no grounds for interference under revisional jurisdiction.

The case involves three criminal revision petitions filed by the petitioners against their conviction under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Rash Driving and Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rashness or Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the accident was caused by the accused's rash or negligent driving.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Gajanan Majik, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 (rash driving) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employee's Writ Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement with Backwages Upheld. Employer's Revision Quashed as Industrial Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Shri Samaruram B. Yadav, was employed as a driver with respondent no.1, a partnership firm engaged in supplying materials to the Gover...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 115 CPC. Tenant's claim of possession based on purchase of shed and payment of rent rejected as findings of fact by courts below were not perverse or without jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Laxman N. Deshmukh, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 394 of 1983 before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Satara, seeking possession of a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Tenancy Dispute, Restores Orders of Agricultural Land Tribunal and SDO. Landlord-Tenant Relationship Established Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 — MRT Exceeded Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original landholder Damodar, challenged a judgment of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 16 Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Eviction Suit — Partnership Firm Not a Necessary Party Under Order 30 CPC. The court held that Order 30 Rule 1 CPC is permissive and non-joinder of a partnership firm does not vitiate eviction proceedings against individual partners.

The applicant, a tenant (son of the original tenant), filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Grievous Hurt in Road Accident — Evidence of Eye Witnesses and Spot Panchanama Sufficient to Prove Negligence.

The applicant, Sumedh Shetye, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Valpoi for offences under Sections 279 and 338 of the Indian Penal...