ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026
17 Jul 2026The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...
Search Results for "rehabilitation act"
1445 result(s) found
Found 1445 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Eviction of Encroachers and Restoration of Forest Lands in Tamil Nadu's Agasthyamalai Landscape — CEC Reports Widespread Illegal Occupation by Government Employees and Slow Implementation of Court Orders. The Court emphasized the need for time-bound eviction, disciplinary action against government encroachers, and monthly review by the Chief Secretary to ensure compliance with forest and wildlife laws.
29 May 2026The Supreme Court was hearing civil appeals concerning two issues: preservation of Reserve Forests, Wildlife Sanctuaries, and Tiger Reserves in Tamil ...
- 543
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Bank to Refer MSME Loan Account for Restructuring Under RBI Framework - Petitioner's MSME Status Entitles It to Benefit of Framework for Revival and Rehabilitation. The court held that the bank was obligated to refer the stressed MSME account to the Committee for restructuring as per the Government Notification dated 29.05.2015 and RBI Master Direction dated 21.07.2016, following the Supreme Court's decision in Pro Knits.
29 Jan 2026The petitioners, Vardhan Agro Processing Limited (petitioner No.1, an MSME) and its chairman and shareholder (petitioner No.2), filed a writ petition ...
- 176
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Mechanical Rejection of Rehabilitation Claims Under National Highways Act. The Court held that the provisions of the First, Second, and Third Schedules of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 apply to land acquisition under the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Competent Authority must individually assess each claimant's entitlement to rehabilitation and resettlement benefits.
25 Oct 2024This batch of writ petitions involved a common question of law: whether and how the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in L...
- 674
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging AGRC Order Imposing Additional 5% Land Cost on Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Project. The court examined the validity of the direction to pay additional land cost due to change in developer under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act and SRA office order.
15 Dec 2023The petitioner, Gemini Developers, a sole proprietorship concern of Mr. Ramesh Malhotra (predecessor of the present petitioner represented by Mr. Deep...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Compensation Under Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Act, 1962. Court upholds Competent Authority's award of compensation for right of user over land for pipeline, finding no error in market value determination or procedural compliance.
27 Mar 2023The petitioner, Gangadhar Karbhari Jadhav, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the compensation awarded b...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Slum Tribunal's Jurisdiction After Amendment. Holds That Amendment Substituting Appellate Forum Is Procedural and Retrospective, Directs Transfer of Pending Appeal to Grievance Redressal Committee Under Section 3C of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act.
4 Apr 2019The petitioner, Omprakash V. Dube, the Chief Promoter of Sahyog SRA Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed), had obtained a declaration from the CEO, S...
- 378
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Developer Removal in Slum Rehabilitation Case Due to Bias — Participation of CEO in Appellate Committee Violates Natural Justice. CEO who passed initial removal order cannot sit as member of High Power Committee hearing appeal against his own order under Slum Rehabilitation Authority regulations.
14 Aug 2012The petitioner, Susme Builders Private Limited, a developer, was selected by the respondent Co-operative Society in 1986 for redevelopment of its prop...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Entry Tax Act — State Legislature Competent to Levy Entry Tax on Goods Imported from Outside State. Levy of Entry Tax Under Entry 52 List II Not Repugnant to Central Sales Tax Act and Is a Reasonable Restriction Under Article 304(b).
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas A...
- 106
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Demolition of Irani Chawl Structures as Unauthorized Construction. Court upholds demolition by Municipal Corporation under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, finding no violation of natural justice as notice was affixed and opportunity of hearing was given.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, residents of Irani Chawl, Prabhadevi, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their structures by the Municipal C...
- 235
