Search Results for "prohibited distance"

163 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 163 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Petitioners Challenging Competent Authority's Orders Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 -- Petitioners Fail to Establish Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice

The judgment involves four connected writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging orders passed by the Competent Aut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Structure in Eco-Sensitive Zone. Construction in Prohibited Area Without Valid Permission Violates Environment Protection Act and CRZ Notification.

The petitioners, M/s. Sai Pushp Enterprises and Yogesh Govind Puranik, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their structure by the Than...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes PIL on Footpath Encroachments with Directions for Removal and Monitoring. Court holds that encroachments on public footpaths violate pedestrian rights and must be cleared by municipal authorities, with compliance monitored by District Legal Services Authority.

The petitioner, D.S. Ramachandra Reddy, an advocate, filed a public interest litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana — Rule 24(i-eeee) Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914. State Government's Exclusive Power Under Section 58(2)(e) to Regulate Licenses in Local Areas Cannot Be Delegated to Financial Commissioner.

The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970, as amended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana. Rule 24(i-eeee) of Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914 as State Government Cannot Delegate Power to Determine Number of Licenses for Entire State.

The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 (as amended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes SDO Order Closing Bore Well for Violation of Natural Justice in Maharashtra Groundwater Act Case. Petitioner's Bore Well Ordered Closed Without Notice or Hearing, Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Maharashtra Groundwater (Development and Management) Act, 2009.

The petitioner, Vikas Panjabrao Mathane, challenged an order dated 04-06-2018 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Achalpur (respondent no.2), which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes SDO Order Closing Bore Well for Violation of Natural Justice in Maharashtra Groundwater Act Case. Petitioner Not Given Hearing Before Direction to Close Bore Well Under Section 52 of Maharashtra Groundwater (Development and Management) Act, 2009.

The petitioner, Vikas Panjabrao Mathane, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 04-06-2018 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Achalpur (r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Claimant's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation and Partly Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq.ft Based on Comparable Sale Instances.

The case involves two appeals arising from a land acquisition matter. The land, measuring 1.21 HR (1,29,345 sq.ft) out of Survey No. 118/3 at Digras, ...