Search Results for "oil company investment"

260 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 260 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Awards in Information Technology Upgrade Contract Dispute. Petition Challenges Awards Granting Refund and Rejecting Counter Claims.

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by CMC Limited (original respondent in the arbitration) impugnin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Considers Appeals by Unsuccessful Resolution Applicants Against Approval of Resolution Plan for Reliance Broadcast Network. Appeals Challenge NCLT Mumbai Orders Dismissing Objections to Challenge Process and Approving Sapphire Media Ltd.’s Plan.

This case involves five company appeals filed before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, arising out of the corpo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Against Partial Arbitral Awards in Koyna Hydro Electric Project Sub-Contract Dispute. Challenge to awards failing on grounds of settlement and coercion under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. (th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Order of Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal in Recovery Proceedings. The Case Involves Settlement and Auction of Property of Bradbury Mills Ltd., a Company in Liquidation, with Multiple Creditors and Guarantors.

The writ petition was filed by Everest Fincap Pvt. Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 22 August 2008, whic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. for Lack of Service of Statutory Notice. Petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956 fails as petitioner Aerotron Limited did not prove service of demand notice under Section 434.

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f...