Search Results for "non obstante"

1162 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1162 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes SARFAESI Proceedings Against Company Under CIRP — Resolution Professional Entitled to Possession of Assets. Held that Section 14 of IBC overrides SARFAESI Act and other laws, and the moratorium under IBC bars any proceedings against the corporate debtor's assets.

The petitioner, M/s. Dreams Infra India Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Resolution Professional Sri Ashok Kriplani appointed by the National Company Law...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Auction Purchasers' Petition in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Overriding Effect of Section 26E Over MVAT Act. Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction Held Free from Prior Sales Tax Attachment Under Section 38C of MVAT Act.

The petitioners, Shailesh K. Bothra and Mukesh C. Karwa, were auction purchasers of a property sold by Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd. (pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assignee of Debt to Proceed Under SARFAESI Act Despite Company Being Under Liquidation. Assignee Steps into Shoes of Original Lender and Can Enforce Security Interest Under Section 13 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The petitioner, ASREC (India) Limited, is a company registered as a Reconstruction Company and Securitisation Company with the Reserve Bank of India u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Appeal Seeking Substitution of Director in Consumer Execution Proceedings During CIRP. Moratorium under Section 14 of IBC does not bar substitution of director as the corporate debtor remains liable.

The case involves an appeal filed by Sudheschandra Gupta against an order dated 01.10.2021 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mahara...