Search Results for "narcotics"

249 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 249 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Other Mandatory Provisions. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellants, Raju Dhanju Rathod and Ramesh Liganna Mudraj, were convicted by the Special Court for NDPS, Bombay, for offences under Section 20(c) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50. Acquittal of Accused for Cultivation and Possession of Ganja Upheld as Mandatory Procedural Requirements Were Not Followed.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Pandurang Mahadeo Patil by the Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, for offences under Sections 20 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Doubtful Seizure. Failure to Offer Personal Search Before Gazetted Officer and Inconsistent Evidence Regarding Recovery of Contraband Lead to Acquittal.

The appellants, Gurmeet Singh and Pyarelal Shridhar Keer @ Pahalwan, were convicted by the NDPS Special Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 - Conviction Set Aside for Failure to Inform Appellant of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate.

The appellant, Shridhar Laxman Chennuri, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 20 read with Section 29 of NDPS Act set aside as search and seizure conducted without proper procedure and evidence of conscious possession was insufficient.

The appellants, Baldeosingh s/o Jagannathsingh Sengar and Ishwarsingh s/o Dakursingh Gaur, were convicted by the Special Court under NDPS Act, Nagpur ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Commercial Quantity and Long Incarceration. The court held that the quantity of Codeine (200 grams) was less than commercial quantity (1000 grams), thus Section 37 NDPS Act not attracted, and granted bail considering the period of custody.

The applicant, Mukesh Rajaram Chaudhari, filed a bail application under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for offenc...