Madras High Court Reserved Judgment on Batch of Writ Petitions Filed Under Article 226 Challenging Dismissal Orders. Petitioners from Various Town Panchayats Sought Quashing of Termination Orders and Reinstatement with Backwages.
23 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "multiple cadre posts"
115 result(s) found
Found 115 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Attempt Limit for PwBD Candidates in Civil Services Examination. Classification Between SC/ST and OBC/General PwBD Candidates Held Reasonable Under Article 14.
4 Feb 2025The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, a person with 57% multiple disability (locomotor and low vision), challenged Rule 3 of the Civil Services Examinatio...
- 716
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.
13 Dec 2024The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...
- 608
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench Addresses Reference on Withdrawal of ACPS Benefits for Non-Qualification in Departmental Test. Court Examines Whether Failing to Achieve Benchmark Marks in Promotion Examination Constitutes Ineligibility or Disqualification Justifying Withdrawal under 2001 and 2010 Government Resolutions.
12 Apr 2024The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was tasked with answering a reference framed by a Division Bench regarding the circumstances under which benef...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Administrative Resolution on Judicial Promotions Under Haryana Superior Judicial Service Rules 2007. The Court Held That the High Court Could Prescribe Separate Minimum Marks in Written Test and Viva Voce Through Administrative Resolution Under Article 235 of the Constitution, as It Supplemented the Statutory Rules to Ensure Merit-Based Assessment.
13 Feb 2024The dispute arose from a batch of appeals challenging a judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court regarding the appointment of thirteen in-service...
- 234
High Court
Karnataka High Court Upholds Deputation Orders and Disciplinary Proceedings Against KSRTC Employees. Transfer and Charge Memo Challenged on Grounds of Malafides and Violation of Regulations.
28 May 2019The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees of the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) challenging various orders ...
- 91
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Transfer Rules for Teachers in Challenge Under Articles 226 and 227. Rules 5 and 19(2) of the Karnataka State Civil Services (Regulation of Transfer of Teachers) Rules, 2017 held valid and intra vires the parent Act and the Right to Education Act, 2009.
24 Apr 2018The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity ...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds State's Power to Appoint CEOs Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Rules, 2014 — Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Appointments Quashed. The court held that the appointments were valid under Rule 4 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Appointment of Chief Executive Officer) Rules, 2014 and the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction.
27 Dec 2016The judgment involves multiple writ petitions and civil applications challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) which set ...
- 161
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Selection Process in District Beed Recruitment Due to Malpractices. Selection Committee Has Power to Cancel Vitiated Process Even If Some Candidates Are Innocent.
14 Aug 2015The petitioners, four individuals who were selected for clerical and Talathi posts in a recruitment process conducted by the District Selection Commit...
- 119
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Vires of Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 Amidst Concerns Over Judicial Independence. Petitioners Argue That Provisions on Appointment, Tenure, and Removal of Tribunal Members Undermine the Constitutional Balance of Power.
1 Jan 1970The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions challenging the vires of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021. The petitioners, led by the Madras Bar Assoc...
- 38
