Search Results for "mineral development"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "mineral development"

337 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 337 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Explanations to Rule 38 of MCR, 2016 and Rule 45(8)(a) of MCDR, 2017 — Royalty Computation on Gross Sale Value Without Deduction of Royalty, DMF, and NMET Contributions is Valid. The Court held that royalty is a tax and not a contractual consideration, and the impugned explanations do not violate Article 14 or Article 265 of the Constitution.

15 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Bans Mining in Eco-Sensitive Zones Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. Minimum 1 km Buffer Zone Mandated to Protect Forest Resources and Wildlife Habitat Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Jun 2022

This judgment arises from a series of interlocutory applications in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India public interest litigati...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Challenge to Mines and Minerals Amendment Act 2015 as Academic Without Substantive Relief. Constitutional validity of auction-based grant of mining leases under Section 11 and ineligibility of pending applications under Section 10A not entertained as petitioner sought no consequential relief.

18 Jun 2019

The petitioner, M/S. MSPL Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Deemed Extension of Mining Lease Under Section 8A(3) of MMDR Act — Lease Cancelled and Expired Before Amendment. Interim Order Staying Cancellation Did Not Revive Lease; Petitioner Not Entitled to Deemed 50-Year Period Under Section 8A(3) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 as Amended by Act No.10/2015.

30 Jun 2021

The petitioner, M/s R.K. Industries, a proprietary concern, was granted a mining lease (ML No.1228) for quartz mineral on 22nd February 1975 under the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Applies Prospective Overruling in Mineral Tax Case to Avoid Financial Hardship and Protect Past Transactions. The court held that the judgment overruling India Cement Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu shall operate prospectively from 25 July 2024, and no new tax demands shall be made for the period prior to that date.

25 Jul 2024

This judgment addresses the question of whether the nine-Judge Bench decision in Mineral Area Development Authority v. Steel Authority of India (MADA)...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Quashes Multiple Criminal Proceedings for Offences Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. Police Investigation Without Authorized Complaint Under Section 22 of the Act Rendered Proceedings Void Ab Initio and Allowed Petitions Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

6 Feb 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad dealt with a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by va...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction for Illegal Sand Mining Under MMRD Act — Revision Petition Dismissed. Petitioner failed to prove ownership of land or valid license for sand extraction, and courts below correctly applied Section 4(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Rules 3(1) and 42 of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994.

25 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Parappa S/o Hamappa Lamani, was convicted by the Civil Judge and JMFC, Shiggaon, in C.C.No.497/2013 for the offence punishable under S...

High Court

High Court Quashes Central Government Order Requiring Mining Company to Stop Operations and Obtain Prior Approval Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Mining Lease Renewal Not Requiring Fresh Approval Under Section 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 as Lease Area Was Already Diverted for Non-Forest Use.

29 Apr 2025

The petitioner, The Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores Limited, a mining company, challenged a communication dated 29 January 2014 issued by the Ministry ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.

4 May 2018

The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)