Search Results for "mandatory meetings"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "mandatory meetings"

657 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 657 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Failure to Move Resolution in Special Meeting Renders Motion Invalid and Attracts Bar Under Section 35(3-A) Against Fresh Motion for One Year.

9 Nov 2023

The petitioners, Savita Shrimant Ghule (Sarpanch) and Ganesh Vishnu Hagawne (Upa-Sarpanch) of Grampanchayat Ukkadgaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Postponement of Zilla Panchayat Elections Due to COVID-19 Pandemic - State Government and Election Commission Directed to Take Appropriate Decision in Public Interest

21 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Kenneth Ian Stewart Silveira, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court at Goa seeking postponement of the Zilla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Bye-Law Amendment and Appointment of Administrator. Court holds that amendment to bye-laws requiring members to pay additional contribution for non-residential use is ultra vires the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Balaji Tower Coop. Housing Society Ltd. and Parthasarathy Rangachari, filed a writ petition challenging the amendment to bye-law 28A ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutionality of Section 7 of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. The Petitions Allege That Ex-Officio Members Cannot Vote in BBMP Elections for Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Standing Committees as It Violates Article 243R of the Constitution.

27 Nov 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging the constitutional validity of Section 7 of the Karnat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Regional Director's Rejection of Amalgamation Scheme Under Section 233 Companies Act — Regional Director Lacks Power to Reject, Must File Application Before NCLT if Scheme Not in Public Interest. The court held that the Regional Director's order rejecting the scheme on grounds of insolvency was without jurisdiction as the proper remedy under Section 233(5) is to approach the NCLT.

1 Aug 2024

The petitioners, five companies with common directors and shareholders, sought to amalgamate petitioner nos. 2 to 5 (wholly-owned subsidiaries) with p...

Tribunals

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Considers Appeal Against Admission of Coffee Day Enterprises to CIRP Under Section 7 of Insolvency Code. Appeal Raises Questions on the Validity of Debenture Trustee's Action and Limitation Period Based on Debenture Trust Deed Provisions.

1 Jan 1970

The appeal arose from an order of the NCLT Bengaluru Bench admitting Coffee Day Enterprises Limited (the corporate debtor) into Corporate Insolvency R...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutionality of Voting Rights of Ex-Officio Members in Municipal Elections Under Section 7 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. The petitions sought declarations that enabling Members of Parliament and State Legislature to vote in elections for Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Standing Committees violates Article 243R of the Constitution and is unconstitutional.

27 Nov 2015

The batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru on 27th November 2015, presided over by Justice Raghvendra S. Chauhan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Central Government's Notification Substituting Nominated Member of Cantonment Board. Legality of Substitution Under Section 13(3) of Cantonments Act, 2006, Without Following Removal Procedure Under Section 34, is in Issue.

3 Nov 2025

The writ petition was filed by a nominated member of the Deolali Cantonment Board challenging a notification dated 06.03.2025 by the Central Governmen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Winding Up of Mutual Fund Schemes and Interprets SEBI Regulations. The Court examined the interrelation and constitutional validity of Regulations 39 to 42 with Regulation 18(15)(c) of the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, while deferring final adjudication pending statutory proceedings under the SEBI Act, 1992.

14 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed civil appeals concerning the interpretation and application of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case Over Creditor Status and Resolution Plan Approval. Statutory Authority's Claim as Financial or Secured Creditor Rejected Due to Lack of Diligent Action During Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

12 Feb 2024

The dispute arose from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of M/s. JNC Construction (P) Ltd, the Corporate Debtor. The appellant, a sta...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)