Search Results for "lease modification"

407 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 407 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010645132024_1

The present batch of writ appeals is directed against a common order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnatak...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Orders in SARFAESI Proceeding. Borrowers Failed to Comply with Conditional Orders and Sale Certificate Was Already Issued to Auction Purchaser.

The case arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders of the Debts Recovery Tribuna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes NCLT Order Directing State to Permit Windmill Operations in Insolvency Case. NCLT Exceeded Jurisdiction by Exercising Judicial Review Over Administrative Decision, Following Supreme Court Decision in Embassy Property Developments v. State of Karnataka.

The dispute arose out of insolvency proceedings against M/s Wind World (India) Limited, which held a lease over forest land for operating windmills. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Port Trust's Eviction Notices for Unauthorized Occupants. Held that lessees/licensees whose tenures expired and who continued in possession without consent are unauthorized occupants liable to eviction under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

The judgment concerns a group of writ petitions filed by various entities who were originally lessees or licensees of land belonging to the Board of T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Mining Lease Renewal Case Due to Time-Barred Application Under Rule 28 of Mines Concession Rules, 1960. Rule 28 held mandatory and intra vires; application received less than six months before lease expiry could not be entertained.

The appeal arose from a mining lease held by the appellant company, which was due to expire on March 22, 1962. Rule 28(1) of the Mines Concession Rule...