Search Results for "land loser"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "land loser"

85 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 85 result(s)

High Court

High Court Rejects Remand Request in Land Acquisition Enhancement Appeal — Acquiring Body's Failure to File Written Statement After Being Allowed to Participate Does Not Warrant Remand. The Court Relied on the Principle That Mere Technicalities Cannot Defeat the Ends of Justice When the Party Had Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses.

2 Feb 2016

The first appeal was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, by the acquiring body, Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Reference Rejection Set Aside Due to Procedural Error. Power of Attorney Holder Entitled to Maintain Reference Under Section 54(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

4 Apr 2024

The appellant, Santosh S. Nayak, as Power of Attorney holder of the land owner Manappa Ramappa Lamani, filed a reference under Section 18 of the Land ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Employer Against Decree of Specific Performance of Employment Agreement; Holds Contract of Personal Service Not a Bar Where Employer is State Instrumentality Under Article 12. The Agreement to Provide Job to Land Loser Upon Majority Was Enforceable Despite Section 14 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 as the Employment Ceased to Have Private Law Character and Attained Status.

3 Apr 2018

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement executed by Western Coalfields Limited, a State instrumentality under Article 12...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Multiple First Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Matter. Dispute Concerns Determination of Compensation for Land Acquired for Nira Deoghar Irrigation Project Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

12 Mar 2019

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Multiple Appeals and Cross-Objections Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Challenging Enhanced Compensation for Railway Project Lands. Market Value Determination at Rs.39,20,400 per Acre by Reference Courts Contested as Inadequate by Landowners and Excessive by Railways.

24 Sep 2020

These appeals and cross-objections arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State for the South Central Railway in Mahagaon village, K...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons to Set Aside Abatement of Arbitration Petition and Condonation of Delay. Application Filed Under Order 22 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Parties on Record.

15 Feb 2013

The Chamber Summons was filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to set aside the abatement of Arbitration Petition N...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Cases Under National Highways Act, 1956. The Court Enhanced Compensation for Landowners and Directed Authorities to Pay Additional Amounts.

9 Jun 2025

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Direction to Town Development Authority to Consider Representation and Implement Land Allotment Resolution. The Court held that the resolution passed by the authority was binding and the authority was obligated to act in accordance with law.

14 Jun 2021

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Bagalkot Town Development Authority and its Rehabilitation Officer against an order of a learned Single J...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)