Search Results for "illegal recovery"

3193 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3193 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yadav Rajbahadur Ghyansingh, was convicted by the Special Judge, Mehsana, for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5204 OF 2019

The present writ petition was filed by six petitioners, including two public limited companies and four individuals, challenging an order dated 30.05....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows EPF Recovery Over Bank's Mortgage in Priority Dispute Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. EPF Dues Have Priority Over Secured Creditors Under Section 11 of EPF Act, 1952.

The case involves three writ appeals arising from orders of a learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.15582 of 2010 and 8686 of 2010 dated 21.06.2011. The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Proof of Demand. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dansinh Rupsinh Parmar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Second Fast Track Court, Amreli in Special Case (ACB) No. 47/19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Education Officer in Bribery Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Section 161 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Harishchandra Prabhakar Borkar, was the Education Officer of Zilla Parishad, Nagpur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, in ...