Search Results for "further cross-examination"

1266 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1266 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Prosecutrix Testimony and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC set aside as inconsistencies in evidence created reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatray @ Kashinath Babaso Khatal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions. Conviction under Sections 8(c) read with Section 20(C) of NDPS Act, 1985 set aside for failure to comply with Sections 42 and 50.

The appellants, Mangalsingh @ Mangesh Chatursingh Onavale, Ambadas Tukaram Pawar, and Sunil Ranjit Mohite @ Dada, were convicted by the NDPS Special C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Alters Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide in Sudden Quarrel Stabbing Case. Single Knife Blow During Intervention Without Premeditation Falls Under Section 304-II IPC, Not Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Rushi Domaji Uike, was convicted by the 3rd Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.13/2003 for the offence punis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death and Injuries in Hit-and-Run Case. Revision Petitioner's Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC and Section 134(a)(b) r/w 187 MV Act Confirmed as Evidence of Rashness and Negligence Was Clear.

The revision petitioner, Mr. Vimanjan Hanumanta Devarkonda, was the original accused in a criminal case arising from a road accident that occurred on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder and Criminal Intimidation Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Dying Declaration. Conviction under Sections 302 and 506 IPC confirmed as prosecution proved chain of circumstances leading to guilt of accused.

The appellant, Prakash Suryakant Lad, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg, for the murder of Sadhana Ahir and for criminal intimidation. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Motive and Relied on Unreliable Witnesses.

The appellant, Shivaji Raghunath Dhadam, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Ramesh Pandurang Dhadam, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Testimonies. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Manoj Shivajrao Patil (husband), Shivajirao Sahebrao Patil (father-in-law), and Shakuntala Shivajirao Patil (mother-in-law), were conv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age. Conviction under Sections 366 and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Essential Ingredients Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Abhang s/o Laximan Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir, for offences under Sections 366 and 376 of the Indian...