Search Results for "drugs and cosmetics"

139 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 139 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging NPPA's Interpretation of DPCO 2013 — Price Ceiling Applicable Only to Formulations in First Schedule. The court held that NPPA cannot impose price ceiling on non-scheduled formulations under DPCO 2013, as the order's language is clear and unambiguous.

The petitioners, M/s. Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. and the Indian Drug Manufacturers Association (IDMA), challenged the interpretation and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Authority's Order in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Activity Held as Manufacturing, Not R&D, for Tariff Classification Under Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, a power distribution company, challenged an order of the Appellate Authority under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which hel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Appellate Authority to Decide Stay Applications in Licence Suspension Cases Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The court held that the appellate authority must promptly decide interim relief to prevent the appeal from becoming infructuous.

The petitioners, who run medical stores and hold licences under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, had their l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Gauhati High Court Decision Striking Down Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004 for Repugnancy with Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. Diploma in Medicine and Rural Health Care Held to Be a Medical Qualification Requiring Central Permission Under Section 10A of IMC Act.

The case involves appeals against the Gauhati High Court's judgment striking down the Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004. The Assam Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 18A Notice Procedure. Failure to Provide Opportunity to Explain Before Filing Complaint Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The petitioners, Parenteral Drugs (India) Ltd and others, filed writ petitions challenging the order dated 24 September 2014 passed by the Chief Judic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Director in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Non-executive director cannot be held liable under Section 34 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 without specific averments of being in charge of business.

The applicant, Devendra Vinaykant Sheth, was original accused No. 7 in R.C.C. No. 686 of 2004 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmednagar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Improper Investigation. Conviction under MCOC Act set aside as procedural requirements under Section 23 of MCOC Act were not complied with.

The appellant, Siddhu @ Siddharth Ramesh Janmejay, was convicted by the Special Judge (MCOC Act), Thane, for offences under the Drugs & Cosmetics Act,...