Search Results for "detenue statement"

137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Reproduction of Grounds. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated as Relevant Documents Not Supplied.

The petitioner, Jitendra @ Tiger Umaji Pawar, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Boot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Confirmation. Detenu's representation not considered independently, violating Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(2) of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985.

The petitioner, Smt. Marry Usha, wife of the detenu Gnana Prakash, filed a writ petition for habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Stale Grounds. Single FIR and Bail Not Sufficient to Treat Detenu as Dangerous Person Affecting Public Order.

The petitioner, Vishal Aananda Mahabal, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootlegger...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Communication of Grounds of Detention. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Grounds Not Served Within Statutory Period.

The petitioner, Smt. Bidisha Goin, wife of the detenu Pandian Muruganathan @ Shiva Pandian, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proximate Link Between Offences and Public Order. Preventive detention set aside as criminal activities did not disturb public order, only law and order.

The petitioner, Sangita Nandu Toradmal, mother of the detenue Sanket @ Khoonkhar Dadya Nandu Toradmal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...