Search Results for "detention without charge sheet"

366 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 366 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Criminal Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Abuse of Process — Quality of a Nation's Civilization Measured by Methods Used in Enforcement of Criminal Law.

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Bhimsen Naik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Default Bail Appeals in UAPA Case — Extension of Investigation Time Valid Despite Procedural Irregularities. Supreme Court Had Restored Extension Order, Charge-Sheet Filed Within Extended Period, Hence No Indefeasible Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC.

The case involves two criminal appeals challenging a common order dated 28th June 2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, NIA, Greater Mumbai, rejec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Default Bail Computation Issue to Larger Bench Due to Conflicting Precedents. The Court Examines Whether Date of Remand is Included or Excluded in Calculating 60/90-Day Period Under Section 167(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for Entitlement to Default Bail.

The Supreme Court addressed a reference concerning the computation of the remand period for default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail to Accused in Murder Case Under Section 167(2) CrPC Due to Investigation Delay. Statutory Right to Default Bail Cannot Be Denied Even When Investigation Under MCOCA Is Pending, as Charge Sheet Was Filed After the Application for Default Bail.

The petitioner, Pankaj Sundarlal Yadav, was accused No.7 in Crime No.113/2015 registered at Police Station Gondia for offences under Section 302 read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Known Language. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Grounds Were Served in English, Not in Kannada Which Detenu Understood.

The petitioner, Smt. Shylamma, mother of the detenu Abhishek @ Abhi @ Sutta, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Resolves Conflict on Applicability of Section 167(2)(a)(i) vs (ii) CrPC for Default Bail in Offences Punishable with Life Imprisonment. The court held that life imprisonment is a term of not less than ten years, thus the 90-day period under clause (ii) applies.

The case arose from a reference made by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court while hearing a bail application filed by two accused persons,...