Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Criminal Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Abuse of Process — Quality of a Nation's Civilization Measured by Methods Used in Enforcement of Criminal Law.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 127
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Bhimsen Naik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.293/2025 registered with the police station. The FIR was lodged by the respondent-State of Maharashtra alleging offences under Sections 420, 406, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The petitioner contended that the dispute was purely civil in nature arising out of a contractual transaction and that the criminal machinery was being misused to exert pressure for recovery of money. The court, after perusing the FIR and the submissions, found that the allegations did not disclose any criminal offence and that the essential ingredients of cheating and criminal breach of trust were absent. The court observed that the quality of a nation's civilization can be largely measured by the methods it uses in the enforcement of criminal law, quoting the Supreme Court in Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P. The court held that continuing the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law and accordingly quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Inherent Powers - Section 482 CrPC - Quashing of FIR - The High Court can exercise its inherent powers to quash criminal proceedings to prevent abuse of process of court and to secure ends of justice. (Paras 1-2)

B) Criminal Law - Abuse of Process - Civil Dispute - Where the allegations in the FIR are purely civil in nature and do not disclose any criminal offence, the continuation of criminal proceedings amounts to an abuse of process of law. (Paras 1-2)

C) Indian Penal Code - Cheating - Section 420 IPC - Ingredients of Cheating - For an offence under Section 420 IPC, there must be fraudulent or dishonest inducement at the inception of the transaction. Mere breach of contract does not constitute cheating. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings should be quashed as an abuse of process of law when the allegations do not disclose any criminal offence and are purely civil in nature.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed FIR No.293/2025 and all consequential proceedings.

Law Points

  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • 1973 (CrPC) Section 482
  • Indian Penal Code
  • 1860 (IPC) Sections 420
  • 406
  • 120B
  • Abuse of Process of Law
  • Inherent Powers of High Court
  • Quashing of FIR
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (12) 162

Writ Petition No. 5764 of 2025

2025-12-03

Bharati Dangre, Shyam C. Chandak

Kushal Mor, Tanmay Karmarkar, Vaibhav Hari, Rishab Khot, Ashish Prasad, Anubha Rastogi, Aditya Joshi, Supriya Kak

Chandrashekhar Bhimsen Naik

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR and criminal proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of FIR No.293/2025 and all consequential proceedings.

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged that the FIR was lodged maliciously and the dispute was civil in nature, amounting to abuse of process of law.

Issues

Whether the FIR discloses any criminal offence or is purely civil in nature. Whether the continuation of criminal proceedings amounts to abuse of process of law.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the dispute is contractual and civil, and criminal law is being misused for recovery. Respondent-State opposed the petition, but the court found no criminal ingredients.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC when the allegations do not disclose any criminal offence and the proceedings are an abuse of process of law. The quality of a nation's civilization is measured by the methods used in enforcement of criminal law.

Judgment Excerpts

The quality of a nation's civilization can be largely measured by the methods it used in the enforcement of the criminal law. The above remark in the Judgment of the Apex Court in Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P. holds good even after three decades and the case before us make us, introspect, where our criminal justice system stands today.

Procedural History

FIR No.293/2025 was registered. The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.5764 of 2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay seeking quashing of the FIR. The court heard the matter and passed the judgment on 3rd December 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 420, 406, 120B
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court "Supreme Court Overrules High Court Order on Land Ceiling Act: Landmark Verdict Upholds Finality of Ceiling Proceedings" "Res judicata prevails; family settlements rejected in surplus land declaration under the UP Ceiling Act."
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Acquittal in Murder Case Based on Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Supreme Court Overturns Conviction Due to Broken Chain of Circumstantial Evidence and Lack of Motive