Search Results for "customs tariff classification"

126 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Notification. Court Holds That Importers Have No Vested Right in Export Obligation Period and Retrospective Amendment Is Valid to Prevent Misuse of Duty Exemption Scheme.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Notification No.2(RE 2013)/2009-14 dated 18th April 2013, which retrosp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Raymond Limited's Appeals in Central Excise Cenvat Credit Dispute. Cenvat Credit of AED (T&TA) on Inputs Can Be Utilized for Payment of BED on Final Products.

The appellant, Raymond Limited, is a company manufacturing blankets from woollen fibres. The blankets attract only Basic Excise Duty (BED) and not Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Classification Dispute. CESTAT's finding that activity was classifiable under Works Contract Service rather than Erection Commissioning and Installation Service upheld.

The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Thane, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Finance Act, 1994 agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Seizure of Vessel Under Customs Act, 1962; Seizure of Re-imported Floating Crane Valid as Exemption Notification Inapplicable When Re-import Not by Original Exporter.

The case involved a writ petition filed by Fomento Resources Private Limited and its director challenging the seizure of a floating crane, MV Maria La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Adjudication Orders for Breach of Natural Justice. Non-Compliance with Tribunal's Remand Directions on Disclosure of Test Reports Amounts to Denial of Fair Hearing Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The writ petition under Article 226 arose from a dispute over the classification of a product known as 'CHOCOS' manufactured by Kellogg India Private ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case on Interest Liability for Provisional Assessment. Section 11DD of Central Excise Act, 1944 not applicable to differential duty determined on finalization of provisional assessment under Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

The appellant, Godrej Industries Limited, was engaged in the manufacture of Liquid Hair Dye during the period from September 1982 to March 1985. The d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court hears appeal against CESTAT order upholding duty demand and confiscation of diamonds due to shortage and non-compliance with export obligations — substantial questions raised on interpretation of Notification No. 177/94-Cus and para 8.78B of Handbook of Procedures.

The appellant, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting gold jewellery studded with diamonds at its unit in the Santacruz Electronics...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Detention of Betelnut Imports Under Customs Act. Goods classified as 'Menthol Scented Sweet Supari' held not liable to detention for want of valid import license under the Plant Quarantine Order, 2003.

The petitioner, Neena Uppal, a sole proprietress of M/s Neena Enterprises, imported betelnuts (Menthol Scented Sweet Supari) and filed bills of entry ...