Search Results for "cross-examination foundation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "cross-examination foundation"

100 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 100 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Medical Negligence Finding Against Doctor and Hospital in Consumer Dispute - Reverses NCDRC Order Due to Lack of Evidence. The Court held that the complainant failed to provide sufficient material or medical evidence to establish negligence under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as mere unfavorable outcome or untoward incident does not per se constitute negligence.

7 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence against a doctor and a hospital following the death of a patient after a secon...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Municipal Corporation in Solid Waste Project Injunction Case — Environmental Claims Lacked Scientific Evidence. Court Restores Trial Court's Dismissal of Suit, Holding That Civil Courts Cannot Restrain Statutory Projects Based on Unsubstantiated Apprehensions.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Ratnagiri Nagar Parishad against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had affirmed the decree of perman...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

27 Apr 2016

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Ishwar Bhanushali, was convicted by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) for Greater Mumbai for offences under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused's Petition for Forensic Examination of Cheque in Dishonour of Cheque Case — Right to Fair Trial Under Article 21 Includes Right to Send Disputed Document for Expert Opinion to Determine Age of Ink and Signature. The court held that the accused's right to defend himself under Article 21 includes the right to seek expert opinion on disputed documents, and rejection of such application without considering the defence is illegal.

3 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Brijratan Mohta, is the accused in a complaint filed by the respondent, Vidarbha Nagrik Pat Sanstha, under Section 138 of the Negotiab...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

30 Sep 2014

The appellant, Rajesh s/o Roopchand Motghare, was a peon with Nagpur Municipal Corporation posted at octroi check post No.10, Wadi. On 20/8/2002, Dili...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Daily Wage Employees in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer's Failure to Produce Attendance Records Leads to Adverse Inference. The court held that non-production of attendance registers by the employer under Section 28 of MRTU and PULP Act warrants an adverse inference under Section 114(g) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, entitling employees to regularization.

23 Jan 2013

The appellants, Rama Atmaram Dahiwal and Mahadeo Karbhari Shinde, were daily wage employees of the Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran (respondent). They f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Reimbursement of Expenses Incurred by Complainant in Criminal Case — State Directed to Pay Amount Spent on Private Advocate Due to Failure to Provide Government Pleader.

22 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Gangadhar Vithobaji Kayande Patil, filed a criminal complaint in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, seeking direction to re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Dispute — Upholds Majority Award on Misrepresentation of Receivables. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's findings on misrepresentation and damages were not perverse and did not warrant interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Mar 2012

The petitioner, GWL Properties Ltd. (formerly Gordon Woodroffe Ltd.), challenged a majority arbitral award dated 31 August 2009 under Section 34 of th...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Rejects Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to reappraisal and that the arbitrator's interpretation of contract terms is final unless perverse.

14 Jan 2011

The petitioner, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery of Licence Fees and Mesne Profits in Hoarding Advertisement Dispute. Plaintiff partnership firm entitled to arrears and future compensation for defendant's continued use of hoarding sites after termination of licence.

13 Jan 2010

The plaintiff, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, carried on business of acquiring sites, erecting hoardings, and permitt...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)