Bombay High Court Allows Recovery of Licence Fees and Mesne Profits in Hoarding Advertisement Dispute. Plaintiff partnership firm entitled to arrears and future compensation for defendant's continued use of hoarding sites after termination of licence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, carried on business of acquiring sites, erecting hoardings, and permitting customers to display advertisements. The defendant, a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, manufactured cranes and steel plant equipment. In early 1977, the defendant approached the plaintiff to display advertisements on two hoardings in the compound of Industry Manor, Prabhadevi, Bombay. An arrangement was reached on 15/3/1977, and the defendant started displaying advertisements. The plaintiff issued bills for licence fees, which the defendant paid until 1985. Thereafter, the defendant stopped paying. The plaintiff filed a suit seeking recovery of Rs. 26,87,340 as arrears of licence fees and compensation at Rs. 17,000 per month per hoarding from the date of suit till discontinuance. The court examined the evidence, including correspondence and bills, and found that the defendant had used the hoardings without payment after 1985. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to recover the arrears and future compensation for wrongful use. The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff with costs.

Headnote

A) Contract Law - Licence Agreement - Recovery of Licence Fees - Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Plaintiff partnership firm granted licence to defendant company to display advertisements on two hoardings. Defendant failed to pay licence fees from 1985 onwards. Court held that plaintiff is entitled to recover arrears of licence fees and mesne profits for wrongful use of the hoardings after termination of licence. (Paras 1-10)

B) Property Law - Mesne Profits - Compensation for Wrongful Use - Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 108 - After termination of licence, defendant continued to use hoardings without payment. Court held that defendant is liable to pay compensation at the rate of Rs. 17,000 per month per hoarding from the date of suit till they discontinue use. (Paras 3-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover licence fees and compensation for the defendant's use of hoarding sites after termination of the licence agreement.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Suit decreed in favor of plaintiffs with costs. Defendants ordered to pay Rs. 26,87,340 as arrears and Rs. 17,000 per month per hoarding from date of suit till discontinuance.

Law Points

  • Licence fee recovery
  • mesne profits
  • compensation for wrongful use
  • termination of licence
  • suit for recovery of money
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 258

SUIT NO.922 OF 1990

2010-01-13

V.M. KANADE, J.

Mr. Tanvir Shaikh with Mr. S.A. Jabbar for Plaintiffs, Mr. Karl Shroff with Mr. Raju Yadav i/b Dhru & Co. for Defendants

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for recovery of licence fees and compensation for use of hoarding sites.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff seeks decree for payment of Rs. 26,87,340 as arrears of licence fees and Rs. 17,000 per month per hoarding as compensation from date of suit till discontinuance.

Filing Reason

Defendant failed to pay licence fees for display of advertisements on plaintiff's hoardings after 1985.

Issues

Whether plaintiff is entitled to recover arrears of licence fees? Whether plaintiff is entitled to compensation for wrongful use of hoardings after termination of licence?

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that defendant used hoardings without payment after 1985 and is liable for arrears and compensation. Defendant's arguments not mentioned in the provided text.

Ratio Decidendi

A party who uses another's property after termination of licence is liable to pay compensation for wrongful use, including arrears of licence fees and mesne profits.

Judgment Excerpts

Plaintiffs are a partnership firm duly registered under the provisions of Indian Partnership Act and they are carrying on business of acquiring various sites, erecting hoarding and permitting their customers to display their advertisements on the said hoarding at agreed rate and agreed terms and conditions. Defendants are a Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act and they are manufacturers of cranes, steel plant equipments and material handling plants.

Procedural History

Suit filed in 1990; heard and decided on 13th January 2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Partnership Act, 1932:
  • Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Recovery of Licence Fees and Mesne Profits in Hoarding Advertisement Dispute. Plaintiff partnership firm entitled to arrears and future compensation for defendant's continued use of hoarding sites after termination of licence...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging PF Applicability and Dues for Seasonal Cotton Processing Unit. Employer's failure to produce records despite multiple opportunities leads to confirmation of liability under Employees' Provident Funds a...