Search Results for "continued detention illegal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "continued detention illegal"

227 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 227 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition for Production of Accused in Taloja Central Prison, Declares Continued Detention Without Production Illegal Under BNSS Section 187 and Article 21. The court held that failure to produce arrested persons before Magistrate within 24 hours as mandated by Section 187 BNSS renders detention illegal and violative of Article 21.

24 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Shazaib Sabir Patel, cousin brother of Safvan Abdul Rauf Patel and Afnan Abdul Rauf Patel (Accused Nos. 2 and 3 in FIR No. 0274 of 202...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under PITNDPS Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Proximate Link. Detention order set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the petitioner's pending bail application and the order was passed mechanically without proper application of mind.

12 May 2020

The petitioner, Mr. Kenneth Jideofor, challenged a preventive detention order dated 23.01.2020 passed by the Joint Secretary to the Government of Indi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Delay in Representation. Preventive Detention Invalid as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Less Restrictive Measures and Unexplained Delay of 22 Days in Disposal of Representation Violated Article 22(5) of Constitution.

18 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Smt. Maimuna, wife of the detenu Sri. Akbar Siddik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu Already in Custody at Time of Order. The court held that the detaining authority must consider the likelihood of release on bail when the detenu is in custody; failure to do so renders the detention order invalid.

16 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Shahrukh Yunus Khan, challenged a preventive detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City, on 23 December 2015 unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Orders.

8 May 2015

The petitioner, Shailesh Dnyaneshwar Kedar, challenged a detention order dated 23 November 2014 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Failure to Serve Grounds — Violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Denied as Grounds Not Communicated Under Section 3(1)(2) of Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980.

29 Aug 2011

The petitioner, Dinesh s/o Ramchandra Tiwari, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order of preventive detention dated 5th April 2011 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in Essential Commodities Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Proximate Link. Preventive Detention Under Section 3(2) of Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Order and There Was Unexplained Delay.

6 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Ravindra Prakash Nikam, challenged an order of detention passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, on 1 March 2011 under Section ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Due to Untruthful Translation of Grounds in Preventive Detention Case. Failure to Furnish Correct Marathi Translation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

15 Mar 2005

The petitioner, father of the detenu Shanidas Parshuram Mhatre, challenged the detention order dated 8.10.2004 passed by the Commissioner of Police, T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Continued Detention Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Consideration of Representation. Failure of Detaining Authority to Consider Detenu's Representation Before State Government Approval Violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

19 Jan 2005

The petitioner, Arif Amin Shaikh, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Dru...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Consideration of Representation and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's representation dated 7-9-2004 was not considered by the detaining authority, and the detention order disclosed total non-application of mind.

12 Jan 2005

The petitioner, Sanpreet Kaur Tejpal Singh, wife of the detenu Tejpal Mann Singh, challenged the detention order dated 6-2-2004 passed by respondent N...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)