Search Results for "cardio respiratory arrest"

138 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 138 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unnatural Conduct of Informant. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yuvraj Keshav Mandge, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his grandmother Anusaya Rajaram ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder of Wife and Assault on Neighbour — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Eye Witness Testimony and Medical Evidence Found Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 302 and 324 IPC.

The appellant, Mahendra Vasudeo Gavas, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg at Oros, for the murder of his wife Mayuri under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder and Attempt to Murder of Police Constables — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 353, 201 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act sustained based on credible eyewitness testimony and recovery of weapons.

The case involves two appeals filed by Raju @ Mukesh Punamchand Dangre and Dipak @ Golu Ananda Tayde against their conviction and sentence by the Addi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder and Attempt to Murder of Police Officers. Circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and recovery of weapons held sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 302, 307, 353, 201 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act.

The case involves two appeals filed by Raju @ Mukesh Punamchand Dangre and Dipak @ Golu Ananda Tayde against their conviction and sentence by the Addi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Parricide Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Recovery of Weapon. Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shivaji Shankara Zagade, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Satara on 30th September 2000 for the murder of his father...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eye Witness Testimony and Doubtful Recovery of Weapon. Bitter Gourd Creeper Dispute Leads to Life Imprisonment Reversed as Court Finds Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Ashok Chindha Birhade, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his neighbour Devidas, arising from a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Proof of Homicidal Death and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 498A, 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish foundational facts and chain of circumstances was incomplete.

The appellant, Santosh Ramchandra Sahare, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of his wife Sangita under Section 302 IPC, cruelty under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Seven Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 148, 447, 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal by seven accused persons convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad in Session Trial No.19 of 2011 for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Rioting and Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 326, 504, 506 of IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal against conviction in Sessions Trial No. 544 of 1998. The appellants, Bhaurao Dangarkar and three others, were convicted f...