Search Results for "area discrepancy"

465 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 465 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes State Government's Cancellation of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Approvals and Directs Fresh Hearing. Inconsistencies Between Government Directives and SRA Circular Were Not Established, and Scheme Was Permitted Under New Housing Policy of 2007.

The petitioner, a developer, submitted a proposal for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme which was in the nature of a Township Development Scheme for approx...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admits Petition Challenging Rejection of Tender Bids for NAINA Infrastructure Project; Interim Stay Ordered. CIDCO Tender Committee Rejected Petitioner's Joint Venture Bids Citing Integrity Pact, GST Registration, and Other Non-Compliances.

This writ petition was filed by Thakur Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. (the lead member of a joint venture with EVRASCON) challenging the rejection of its tec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments in Co-operative Housing Society. Court Holds That Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments Without General Body Approval Are Void Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, B. K. Corporation, an association of persons, filed a writ petition challenging the validity of a re-development agreement and bye-law...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 377 IPC and Section 8(2) of Goa Children's Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rukmuddin Kudminchi, was convicted by the Children's Court for the State of Goa in Special Case No.52/2011 for offences under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Encroachment Suit — Remands for Fresh Consideration Due to Failure to Frame Points for Determination. The appellate court's judgment was set aside for non-compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, and the matter was remanded for fresh disposal.

The original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by his legal heir) filed a suit for removal of encroachment against defendant nos.1 and 2, claimin...