High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, considers Second Appeal against dismissal of first appeal and confirmation of trial court decree in a suit for declaration, rectification of sale deed, and permanent injunction. Case involves alleged wrong khasra numbers in a 1959 sale deed, possession of agricultural lands, and deemed tenancy claims under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1958, with final appellate ruling not included in the provided text.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur, heard a second appeal arising from a suit for declaration of ownership, rectification of a sale deed, and permanent injunction concerning agricultural fields at Mouza Sonapur. The original plaintiffs, now respondents, claimed that they purchased the suit fields from Dumabai Wd/o. Kanhu Patil for Rs. 1000 on 08/06/1959 by a registered sale deed and were put in possession. They alleged that wrong khasra numbers were mentioned in the sale deed due to a mistake or mischief by the then Patwari, as the vendor and some plaintiffs were illiterate. The mistake came to light after Dumabai's death in 1977 when the original defendants, now appellants, allegedly tried to disturb possession and claim rights over the property. The plaintiffs further amended their plaint to claim deemed ownership under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1958, from 01/04/1963, and relied on an order dated 17/02/1976 by the Sub-Divisional Land Tribunal in a ceiling case adjudging the suit survey numbers as belonging to them. The defendants filed a written statement denying the plaintiffs' possession and ownership, asserting that the property had vested in them, that no sale had taken place, and that they had applied to the Tahsildar for mutation, not for an heirship certificate. The trial court decreed the suit on 25/01/1984 in Regular Civil Suit No. 361/1977. The first appellate court dismissed the defendants' appeal on 13/02/2003 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 113/1984. In the second appeal, the High Court was required to examine whether the concurrent findings were sustainable, including issues of mistake in the sale deed, possession, tenancy rights, and the binding effect of the ceiling order. The provided judgment text, however, ends during the narration of facts and does not include the High Court's final analysis, reasoning, or operative order. Accordingly, the final decision of the second appeal is not mentioned in the available excerpt, and no ratio decidendi can be extracted from the High Court's own reasoning. The procedural history includes multiple amendments to bring legal heirs on record, and the judgment was reserved on 08/09/2023 and pronounced on 13/10/2023.

Headnote

A) Property Law - Rectification of Sale Deed - Mistake in Khasra Numbers - Not mentioned - Plaintiffs alleged that wrong khasra numbers were written in the registered sale deed dated 08/06/1959 due to patwari's mistake or mischief; the trial court and first appellate court decreed the suit for rectification and declaration, but the High Court's final determination is not available in the provided excerpt. (Paras 3-5)

B) Property Law - Possession and Permanent Injunction - Entitlement to Retain Possession - Not mentioned - Plaintiffs claimed continuous possession since 1959 and apprehended disturbance by defendants; defendants denied possession and claimed property vested in them; no final appellate ruling on this issue is included in the excerpt. (Paras 3-7)

C) Tenancy Law - Deemed Ownership - Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1958 - Plaintiffs claimed they became deemed owners on 01/04/1963 as Bataidar tenants of the suit fields; this issue was raised by amendment and no final determination appears in the provided text. (Para 5)

D) Land Ceiling Law - Binding Effect of Ceiling Order - Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Plaintiffs relied on order dated 17/02/1976 in Revenue Case No. 132/60-A(5)/1975-76 adjudging suit survey numbers as belonging to plaintiffs; the binding effect of this order was not analysed in the available excerpt. (Para 5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the concurrent findings of the trial court and first appellate court regarding rectification of sale deed, declaration of ownership, possession, and permanent injunction were sustainable in second appeal; whether the plaintiffs became deemed owners under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1958; and whether the order in ceiling proceedings was binding on the defendants.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act
  • 1958 deemed ownership on 01/04/1963
  • Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act
  • 1961 orders binding
  • rectification of sale deed for mutual mistake
  • permanent injunction requires lawful possession
  • declaration of ownership based on registered sale deed
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (10) 240

Second Appeal No. 320/2003

2023-10-13

Smt. M.S. Jawalkar, J.

2023:BHC-NAG:15547

Shri Madhur A. Deo (h/f Shri R. Joshi) for Appellants; Shri A.U. Deshmukh (h/f Shri R.R. Vyas) for Respondents

Lahanubai Sitaram Chalakh (Deleted), Sou. Vimalabai Dewaji Kunghadkar, Sundarabai Dewaji Pipre (deceased) through LRs, Ganpat Sakharam Burade (deceased) through LRs, Bhagirathbai Nimbaji Pipre (deceased) through LRs, Kisan Sitaram Chalak

Dewaji Bondaku Bhandekar (deceased) through LRs, Kawdu Dewaji Bhandekar, Sokaji Dewaji Bhandekar (deceased) through LRs, Vinayak Dewaji Bhandekar, Bhanu Dewaji Bhandekar (deceased) through LRs, Sitaram Dewaji Bhandekar (deceased) through LRs

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Second appeal against concurrent findings of lower courts in a suit for declaration, rectification of sale deed, and permanent injunction.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought setting aside of the lower court decrees and dismissal of the plaintiffs' suit.

Filing Reason

Appeal filed being aggrieved by the first appellate court's dismissal of the appeal and confirmation of the trial court's decree.

Previous Decisions

Trial Court decreed the suit on 25/01/1984 in Regular Civil Suit No. 361/1977; First Appellate Court dismissed the appeal on 13/02/2003 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 113/1984.

Issues

Whether the sale deed dated 08/06/1959 contained a mistake in khasra numbers warranting rectification. Whether the plaintiffs were in possession of the suit fields and entitled to declaration and permanent injunction. Whether the plaintiffs became deemed owners under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1958 from 01/04/1963. Whether the order dated 17/02/1976 in ceiling proceedings was binding on the defendants.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiffs claimed purchase of suit fields from Dumabai for Rs. 1000 on 08/06/1959, possession since then, wrong khasra numbers due to patwari's mistake, and later deemed ownership under tenancy law and binding ceiling order. Defendants denied plaintiffs' possession and ownership, asserted that property vested in them, denied any sale, and stated they applied to Tahsildar for mutation, not heirship certificate.

Judgment Excerpts

The present Appeal is filed by the Appellants being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 13/02/2003 passed by learned 4th Ad-hoc Additional District Judge, Chandrapur (i.e. First Appellate Court) in Reg. Civil Appeal No. 113/1984, thereby dismissing the Appeal of the Appellants (original Defendants) and confirming the judgment and decree dated 25/01/1984 passed by the learned 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chandrapur (i.e. Trial Court) in Reg. Civil Suit No. 361/1977 decreeing the Suit of the Respondents (original Plaintiffs). The claim of the Plaintiffs was that they have purchased fields of Sonapur mentioned in Paragraph 2 of the Plaint (hereinafter referred to as “the suit fields”) from Dumabai Wd/o. Kanhu Patil for Rs. 1000/- on 08/06/1959 by Registered Sale-Deed and they were put in possession by said Dumabai of those fields. while executing the Sale-Deed, instead of Khasra Nos. 29/2, 66/3, 66/6 and 66/7 of the suit fields with areas, as stated by them in Paragraph 4 of the Plaint, came to be wrongly written in the Sale-Deed on account of the fact that the then Patwari before execution of Sale-Deed gave those wrong khasra numbers of the suit fields for execution of Sale-Deed, either to play mischief or by bonafide mistake.

Procedural History

Original plaintiffs filed Regular Civil Suit No. 361/1977 before the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chandrapur for declaration, rectification, and injunction. Trial Court decreed the suit on 25/01/1984. Original defendants filed Regular Civil Appeal No. 113/1984 before the 4th Ad-hoc Additional District Judge, Chandrapur. First Appellate Court dismissed the appeal on 13/02/2003. Appellants then filed Second Appeal No. 320/2003 before the High Court. Multiple amendments were made to bring legal heirs on record. Judgment was reserved on 08/09/2023 and pronounced on 13/10/2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1958:
  • Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, considers Second Appeal against dismissal of first appeal and confirmation of trial court decree in a suit for declaration, rectification of sale deed, and permanent injunction. Case involves alleged ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Examines Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement. State Appeals Against Reference Court Award Enhancing Compensation from ₹130 to ₹1590 per Square Metre Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.