Search Results for "Vested Forest"

238 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 238 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Government Engineer in Lokayukta Case — Source Information Report Lacks Credible Material. Court holds that mere source information without verification cannot justify registration of crime under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, an Assistant Executive Engineer in the Public Works Department and currently functioning as Assistant Director of Town Planning, Yelah...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Wildlife Protection Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 39 and 40 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of animal articles beyond reasonable doubt.

The petitioner, Boraiah @ Boregowda @ Papanna, was originally acquitted by the trial court (Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) & JMFC, Gundlupet) in C.C.No.494/200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Injunction in Property Dispute — Prima Facie Case Established for Temporary Injunction. The court set aside the trial court's order and remanded for fresh consideration of the injunction application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The appellant, M/s Lumbini Gardens Limited, filed a suit for permanent injunction to restrain the respondents (State of Karnataka and others) from unl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State to Issue Notification Giving Effect to Withdrawal of Land Acquisition Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Minister's Order Deleting Land from Acquisition Must Be Implemented by Issuing Appropriate Notification.

The petitioner, Vishnudev Coop. Hsg. Society, a registered cooperative society, was the owner of land admeasuring 10H 33R forming part of Survey No.21...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Error Apparent on Face of Record in Limitation Finding. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC and Order 47 Rule 1 is limited to errors apparent on record, not re-appreciation of evidence.

The review petition was filed by Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (the original respondent no.1 in Arbitration Appeal No. 6 of 2007) seeking review of ...