Search Results for "Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Rules"

212 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Setting Aside Termination with Retrospective Effect. Termination of Employee with Retrospective Effect from Date of Medical Unfitness Held Illegal as It Deprives Employee of Opportunity to Be Heard.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment of the Labour Court dated 22.08.2017 allowing Complaint ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding of Violation of Sections 25F and 25G, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, But Questions Reinstatement Relief. The Court Examines Whether Reinstatement with Back Wages Is Mandatory for a Daily-Wager Illegally Retrenched from a Temporary Afforestation Scheme.

The writ petition arose from a challenge by the employer, the Social Forestry Department of the Government of Maharashtra, against the concurrent orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses IPS Officer's Challenge to Rejection of Voluntary Retirement. Central Government's Decision to Reject Voluntary Retirement Upheld as Disciplinary Proceedings Were Contemplated and Petitioner Was Not Clear from Vigilance Angle.

The petitioner, a 1997 batch IPS officer of Maharashtra Cadre, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 7th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stay on Appointment of Special Auditor Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. Order under Section 81(3)(c) for Test Audit Held Administrative, Not Quasi-Judicial, Hence Revision Under Section 154 Not Maintainable.

The petitioners, complainants, sought a test audit of respondent No.6 society under Section 81(3)(c) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 196...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay examines Official Liquidator’s report for declaration of sub-lease executed by lessee as void. The matter involves sub-lease of company property during pendency of winding up, with allegations of fabricated documents.

The matter concerns an Official Liquidator’s report filed in the winding up of Modi Stone Limited, seeking a declaration that a sub-lease dated 20 M...